38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No religion encourages any activity which creates pollution: SC on firecrackers bursting amid severe air pollution

By Jhanak Sharma      11 November, 2024 06:07 PM      0 Comments
No religion encourages any activity which creates pollution SC on firecrackers bursting amid severe air pollution

NEW DELHI: Following no respite in severe air pollution in the national capital, the Supreme Court on Monday said no religion encouraged any activity which creates pollution as it emphasised that right to live in pollution free atmosphere is a fundamental right of every citizen, protected by Article 21 of the Constitution.

Considering the issue of alleged failure of the concerned authorities to implement the firecrackers ban in Delhi during Diwali, a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih asked the NCR states to respond to the issue of banning manufacture, storage, and sale and bursting of firecrackers, within their limits.

Taking up the matter, the bench said, "The right to live in a pollution free atmosphere is a fundamental right of every citizen, which is protected by Article 21 of the Constitution. Prima facie, we are of the view that no religion encourages any activity which creates pollution. If fire crackers are burnt in this fashion, it also affects the fundamental right to health of citizens”.

During the hearing, the court termed the efforts by the police in seizing raw materials as merely an eyewash.

The court directed the Delhi police commissioner to immediately inform all the stakeholders concerned about the ban order and ensure no sale and manufacture of crackers took place.

“We direct Delhi police commissioner to form a special cell to ensure effective implementation of the ban on fire crackers," the bench said.

The court recorded a submission by the counsel for Delhi government that the government will take a decision on extending the ban on fire crackers throughout the year, after consulting all stakeholders.

“We direct the state government to take appropriate decision before November 25. We direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to take effective steps to implement the order passed. We direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to file a personal affidavit before November 25, putting on record steps taken by Delhi police to implement the ban (on firecrackers),” the bench said.  

Also Read: Supreme Court slams Punjab, Haryana for failing to curb stubble burning amid rising Delhi Air Pollution

The bench also asked the NCR states to respond to the issue of banning manufacture, storage, and sale and bursting of firecrackers, within the limits of NCR states.

“All states must respond before November 25,” the bench said.

The case was related to the air pollution in Delhi.

The court also examined the action taken by concerned authorities across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh against the menace of stubble burning.

During the hearing, the bench orally observed, "If anybody is claiming the right to burst firecrackers under Article 21, let that person come to the court."

The state government counsel said besides Diwali, there are also other events.

The bench then asked, "Why just limit the ban to Diwali!"

The Centre’s counsel submitted that the Delhi Government issued directions only on October 14, just two days after Dussehra, and nothing was done before that. The bench asked till then the central government granted the license?

The Centre’s counsel said it had to give the license because the ban was imposed on October 14.

The bench noted that as far as implementation of firecracker ban is concerned, the Delhi government has expressed helplessness as the same has to be implemented by Delhi Police. The bench wondered why Delhi government delayed imposition of the ban till October 14, and it is possible that many must have already got the stock of firecrackers before that.

Earlier, the court had said there were widespread news reports that the ban on firecrackers (in Delhi NCR) was not implemented at all, this was supposed to be an important measure to reduce pollution.

The bench had then said something has to be worked out at least for the next year to curb air pollution in 2025. 
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-declares-transgender-rights-act-a-special-law-orders-board-to-amend-educational-records
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Declares Transgender Rights Act a Special Law, Orders Board to Amend Educational Records [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules Transgender Rights Act, 2019 as special law; directs education board to update transgender man’s name and gender in records.

12 November, 2025 11:00 AM
sc-grants-statutory-status-to-delhi-ridge-management-board-to-safeguard-delhis-green-lungs
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Statutory Status to Delhi Ridge Management Board to Safeguard Delhi’s “Green Lungs” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court directs statutory status for Delhi Ridge Management Board, calling the Ridge Delhi’s “green lungs” vital to combat rising air pollution.

12 November, 2025 11:15 AM
arbitration-agreement-valid-without-signatures-if-consensus-evident-from-conduct-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Arbitration Agreement Valid Without Signatures if Consensus Evident from Conduct: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Arbitration agreement valid even without signatures if parties’ conduct shows intent to arbitrate, rules Kerala High Court in Sigmatic Nidhi Ltd v. Suresh Kumar.

12 November, 2025 11:29 AM
madras-hc-refers-questions-of-caste-certificate-verification-after-retirement-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Refers Questions Of Caste Certificate Verification After Retirement To Larger Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers issue of caste certificate verification after retirement to larger bench amid conflicting rulings on post-retirement inquiries.

12 November, 2025 11:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email