38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No religion encourages any activity which creates pollution: SC on firecrackers bursting amid severe air pollution

By Jhanak Sharma      11 November, 2024 06:07 PM      0 Comments
No religion encourages any activity which creates pollution SC on firecrackers bursting amid severe air pollution

NEW DELHI: Following no respite in severe air pollution in the national capital, the Supreme Court on Monday said no religion encouraged any activity which creates pollution as it emphasised that right to live in pollution free atmosphere is a fundamental right of every citizen, protected by Article 21 of the Constitution.

Considering the issue of alleged failure of the concerned authorities to implement the firecrackers ban in Delhi during Diwali, a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih asked the NCR states to respond to the issue of banning manufacture, storage, and sale and bursting of firecrackers, within their limits.

Taking up the matter, the bench said, "The right to live in a pollution free atmosphere is a fundamental right of every citizen, which is protected by Article 21 of the Constitution. Prima facie, we are of the view that no religion encourages any activity which creates pollution. If fire crackers are burnt in this fashion, it also affects the fundamental right to health of citizens”.

During the hearing, the court termed the efforts by the police in seizing raw materials as merely an eyewash.

The court directed the Delhi police commissioner to immediately inform all the stakeholders concerned about the ban order and ensure no sale and manufacture of crackers took place.

“We direct Delhi police commissioner to form a special cell to ensure effective implementation of the ban on fire crackers," the bench said.

The court recorded a submission by the counsel for Delhi government that the government will take a decision on extending the ban on fire crackers throughout the year, after consulting all stakeholders.

“We direct the state government to take appropriate decision before November 25. We direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to take effective steps to implement the order passed. We direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to file a personal affidavit before November 25, putting on record steps taken by Delhi police to implement the ban (on firecrackers),” the bench said.  

Also Read: Supreme Court slams Punjab, Haryana for failing to curb stubble burning amid rising Delhi Air Pollution

The bench also asked the NCR states to respond to the issue of banning manufacture, storage, and sale and bursting of firecrackers, within the limits of NCR states.

“All states must respond before November 25,” the bench said.

The case was related to the air pollution in Delhi.

The court also examined the action taken by concerned authorities across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh against the menace of stubble burning.

During the hearing, the bench orally observed, "If anybody is claiming the right to burst firecrackers under Article 21, let that person come to the court."

The state government counsel said besides Diwali, there are also other events.

The bench then asked, "Why just limit the ban to Diwali!"

The Centre’s counsel submitted that the Delhi Government issued directions only on October 14, just two days after Dussehra, and nothing was done before that. The bench asked till then the central government granted the license?

The Centre’s counsel said it had to give the license because the ban was imposed on October 14.

The bench noted that as far as implementation of firecracker ban is concerned, the Delhi government has expressed helplessness as the same has to be implemented by Delhi Police. The bench wondered why Delhi government delayed imposition of the ban till October 14, and it is possible that many must have already got the stock of firecrackers before that.

Earlier, the court had said there were widespread news reports that the ban on firecrackers (in Delhi NCR) was not implemented at all, this was supposed to be an important measure to reduce pollution.

The bench had then said something has to be worked out at least for the next year to curb air pollution in 2025. 
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email