38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

By Harshil Jain      11 July, 2020 06:24 PM      0 Comments
Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

On Wednesday 8 July 2020, the Delhi High Court allowed private schools to bar children from attending online classes due to non-payment of tuition fees. Earlier, the Delhi Government restrained private schools from taking any action against those children who could not pay tuition fees during the lockdown.

The matter was heard by a single bench of Justice Jayant Nath, wherein, he held, Where the parents are in default for payment of tuition fee for more than two months, the petitioner is free to issue appropriate notice to such parents to explain the reason for such default.

In case the parents can convince/demonstrate to the petitioner about their financial problems/ financial incapacity to immediately pay the pending fees, the petitioner shall not take any further steps for the time being against such parents, the bench added, where the parents are unable to satisfy/ demonstrate to the petitioner regarding their financial difficulties, the 

petitioner is free to so communicate the same to the parents and decline to provide the ID and password for online education facility for the students.

The petition, filed by Queen Mary School Northend, challenged the Delhi Governments order dated 18 April 2020, which was issued by the Directorate of Education, wherein, private schools were precluded 

from charging any other fees from students, except tuition fees, till the lockdown ends.

The petitioner sought permission to charge the actual expenditure that is being incurred by the school in conducting online classes, in the form of fees from the students. It also demanded issuance of a proper writ to quash the Delhi governments circular.

Learned counsel, on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that he had grievances regarding Clause (i), Clause (viii), and Clause (x) of the Circular dated 18 April 2020. The Circular stands ultra-vires to the Delhi School Education Act, he added.

Clause (i) of the said Circular states that no fee, except tuition fee, shall be charged from the parents during the lockdown period. Clause (viii) of the same states, in no case, the ID and password shall be denied for getting online access of educational facilities/classes/materials to those students who are unable to pay the school fee due to financial crisis arising out of the closure of business activities.

The petitioner contended that the School is facing a grave financial crisis, as about 40 percent of the students have not paid their tuition fees taking undue advantage of the said order.

Previously, the disputed Circular was called into question in Naresh Kumar v. Director of Education &Anr. before a division bench of the Delhi High Court. Declining to interfere with the governments decision, the Court merely cautioned about misuse of such a provision. It held, While implementing this provision, ensure that it is not misused, and extend its magnanimity only to persons who are, actually, in a state of the financial crisis, owing to the lockdown. It would be necessary for parents, seeking the benefit of this relief, to establish, to the satisfaction of the school, or the DoE, that, owing to the lockdown, they are, in fact, financially incapacitated from paying school fees.

The Hon'ble Court, however, made provisions for the parents to put up their grievances regarding any decision/order of the petitioner school, wherein, the parents are permitted to approach appropriate authority of the Government of Delhi of NCT/respondent.

[Queen Mary School Northend v. Director of Education; WP (C) No. 4011/2020]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

big-legal-tech-meet-at-delhi-hc-sc-judge-sanjay-karol-to-be-chief-guest-at-indian-law-and-ai-congress-2026
Trending Legal Insiders
Big Legal-Tech Meet at Delhi HC, SC Judge Sanjay Karol to be Chief Guest at Indian Law & AI Congress 2026

Indian Law & AI Congress 2026 at Delhi High Court on Feb 11. Justice Sanjay Karol to be chief guest. Live streaming by LawStreet Journal.

10 February, 2026 10:27 AM
kerala-hc-affirms-vicarious-liability-of-managing-director-under-section-141-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Affirms Vicarious Liability of Managing Director Under Section 141 NI Act for Dishonoured Cheques [Read Order]

Kerala High Court upholds Managing Director’s vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act in cheque dishonour case, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

10 February, 2026 11:41 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email