38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 12, 2024

Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

By Harshil Jain      11 July, 2020 06:24 PM      0 Comments
Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

On Wednesday 8 July 2020, the Delhi High Court allowed private schools to bar children from attending online classes due to non-payment of tuition fees. Earlier, the Delhi Government restrained private schools from taking any action against those children who could not pay tuition fees during the lockdown.

The matter was heard by a single bench of Justice Jayant Nath, wherein, he held, “Where the parents are in default for payment of tuition fee for more than two months, the petitioner is free to issue appropriate notice to such parents to explain the reason for such default.”

“In case the parents can convince/demonstrate to the petitioner about their financial problems/ financial incapacity to immediately pay the pending fees, the petitioner shall not take any further steps for the time being against such parents,” the bench added, “where the parents are unable to satisfy/ demonstrate to the petitioner regarding their financial difficulties, the 

petitioner is free to so communicate the same to the parents and decline to provide the ID and password for online education facility for the students.”

The petition, filed by Queen Mary School Northend, challenged the Delhi Government’s order dated 18 April 2020, which was issued by the Directorate of Education, wherein, private schools were precluded 

from charging any other fees from students, except tuition fees, till the lockdown ends.

The petitioner sought permission to charge the actual expenditure that is being incurred by the school in conducting online classes, in the form of fees from the students. It also demanded issuance of a proper writ to quash the Delhi government’s circular.

Learned counsel, on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that he had grievances regarding Clause (i), Clause (viii), and Clause (x) of the Circular dated 18 April 2020. The Circular stands ultra-vires to the Delhi School Education Act, he added.

Clause (i) of the said Circular states that “no fee, except tuition fee, shall be charged from the parents during the lockdown period.” Clause (viii) of the same states, “in no case, the ID and password shall be denied for getting online access of educational facilities/classes/materials to those students who are unable to pay the school fee due to financial crisis arising out of the closure of business activities.”

The petitioner contended that the School is facing a grave financial crisis, as about 40 percent of the students have not paid their tuition fees taking “undue advantage” of the said order.

Previously, the disputed Circular was called into question in Naresh Kumar v. Director of Education &Anr. before a division bench of the Delhi High Court. Declining to interfere with the government’s decision, the Court merely cautioned about “misuse” of such a provision. It held, “While implementing this provision, ensure that it is not misused, and extend its magnanimity only to persons who are, actually, in a state of the financial crisis, owing to the lockdown. It would be necessary for parents, seeking the benefit of this relief, to establish, to the satisfaction of the school, or the DoE, that, owing to the lockdown, they are, in fact, financially incapacitated from paying school fees.”

The Hon'ble Court, however, made provisions for the parents to put up their grievances regarding any decision/order of the petitioner school, wherein, the parents are permitted to approach appropriate authority of the Government of Delhi of NCT/respondent.

[Queen Mary School Northend v. Director of Education; WP (C) No. 4011/2020]

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Repatriate Mortal Remains of Sufi Saint from Dhaka

Supreme Court declines plea to repatriate mortal remains of Sufi Saint, an Indian-born Pakistani national who died in Dhaka.

06 April, 2024 01:40 PM
Trending Judiciary
'28 % GST on online gaming companies,' SC transfers to itself all pleas pending in 9 HCs

Supreme Court consolidates 27 petitions challenging the 28% GST on online gaming companies from 9 High Courts, amid legal disputes over tax rates.

06 April, 2024 01:45 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to Prof Shoma Sen in Bhima Koregaon case [Read Judgment]

SC grants bail to Prof Shoma Sen in Bhima Koregaon case, citing lack of evidence linking her to banned terrorist group CPI (Maoist). Details inside.

06 April, 2024 01:58 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC directs TN DGP to hold inquiry for blatant, shocking acts by police in tutoring witnesses [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court directs Tamil Nadu DGP to investigate police misconduct in witness tampering, leading to acquittal in murder case.

06 April, 2024 05:31 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email