38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, January 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

By Harshil Jain      11 July, 2020 06:24 PM      0 Comments
Students Can Be Denied Attendance to Online Classes Over Non-Payment of Tuition Fees: Delhi HC

On Wednesday 8 July 2020, the Delhi High Court allowed private schools to bar children from attending online classes due to non-payment of tuition fees. Earlier, the Delhi Government restrained private schools from taking any action against those children who could not pay tuition fees during the lockdown.

The matter was heard by a single bench of Justice Jayant Nath, wherein, he held, Where the parents are in default for payment of tuition fee for more than two months, the petitioner is free to issue appropriate notice to such parents to explain the reason for such default.

In case the parents can convince/demonstrate to the petitioner about their financial problems/ financial incapacity to immediately pay the pending fees, the petitioner shall not take any further steps for the time being against such parents, the bench added, where the parents are unable to satisfy/ demonstrate to the petitioner regarding their financial difficulties, the 

petitioner is free to so communicate the same to the parents and decline to provide the ID and password for online education facility for the students.

The petition, filed by Queen Mary School Northend, challenged the Delhi Governments order dated 18 April 2020, which was issued by the Directorate of Education, wherein, private schools were precluded 

from charging any other fees from students, except tuition fees, till the lockdown ends.

The petitioner sought permission to charge the actual expenditure that is being incurred by the school in conducting online classes, in the form of fees from the students. It also demanded issuance of a proper writ to quash the Delhi governments circular.

Learned counsel, on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that he had grievances regarding Clause (i), Clause (viii), and Clause (x) of the Circular dated 18 April 2020. The Circular stands ultra-vires to the Delhi School Education Act, he added.

Clause (i) of the said Circular states that no fee, except tuition fee, shall be charged from the parents during the lockdown period. Clause (viii) of the same states, in no case, the ID and password shall be denied for getting online access of educational facilities/classes/materials to those students who are unable to pay the school fee due to financial crisis arising out of the closure of business activities.

The petitioner contended that the School is facing a grave financial crisis, as about 40 percent of the students have not paid their tuition fees taking undue advantage of the said order.

Previously, the disputed Circular was called into question in Naresh Kumar v. Director of Education &Anr. before a division bench of the Delhi High Court. Declining to interfere with the governments decision, the Court merely cautioned about misuse of such a provision. It held, While implementing this provision, ensure that it is not misused, and extend its magnanimity only to persons who are, actually, in a state of the financial crisis, owing to the lockdown. It would be necessary for parents, seeking the benefit of this relief, to establish, to the satisfaction of the school, or the DoE, that, owing to the lockdown, they are, in fact, financially incapacitated from paying school fees.

The Hon'ble Court, however, made provisions for the parents to put up their grievances regarding any decision/order of the petitioner school, wherein, the parents are permitted to approach appropriate authority of the Government of Delhi of NCT/respondent.

[Queen Mary School Northend v. Director of Education; WP (C) No. 4011/2020]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

victims-appeal-against-acquittal-can-be-summarily-dismissed-when-no-prima-facie-arguable-case-exists-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Victim’s Appeal Against Acquittal Can Be Summarily Dismissed When No Prima Facie Arguable Case Exists: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a victim’s appeal against acquittal can be summarily dismissed under BNSS if no prima facie arguable case is shown.

10 January, 2026 12:52 AM

TOP STORIES

if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM
theft-worth-below-5000-is-non-cognizable-offence-under-bns-police-cannot-register-fir-without-magistrates-permission-andhra-hc
Trending Judiciary
Theft Worth Below ₹5,000 Is Non-Cognizable Offence Under BNS; Police Cannot Register FIR Without Magistrate’s Permission: Andhra HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules theft below ₹5,000 is non-cognizable under BNS; police cannot register FIR or investigate without magistrate’s permission.

05 January, 2026 07:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email