38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Nothing wrong in use of spyware for security purposes; citizens right to privacy protected: SC

By Harshvardhan Sharma      29 April, 2025 03:29 PM      0 Comments
Nothing wrong in use of spyware for security purposes citizens right to privacy protected SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said there was "nothing wrong" in using spyware as long as it was for the security of the nation, but made it clear that citizens' right to privacy is protected under the Constitution.

Considering a bunch of petitions challenging the alleged use of the Israeli software Pegasus by the Union government, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh said that the court would not disclose any report that touches the security and sovereignty of the country, but indicated that it may address individual apprehensions of privacy breach.

Supreme Court Affirms Pegasus Can Be Used Against Threats Without Violating Privacy Rights

Senior Advocate Dinesh Dwivedi, for a petitioner, said that the basic issue was whether the government used this spyware and whether they have purchased it.

If the government has it, then nothing prevents it from using the spyware further, he submitted.

“What is wrong if the country is using that spyware against (the anti-national elements). To have the spyware is not wrong; against whom it is used, that is the question. We cannot compromise and sacrifice the security of the nation. However, private individuals' right to privacy is protected under the Constitution," the bench said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, also asked what was wrong if the government was using it against the terrorists.

At the outset, the bench asked the counsel as to what survived in the matter.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal for a petitioner sought to cite a judgment of the US district court.

He said, “they found that India was a country where it was hacked and WhatsApp has confirmed it”.

The bench said it was relevant at the beginning of the case, and now the court has already examined the aspect, issued a detailed judgment, and constituted a committee headed by former judge Justice R V Raveendran, and its report has been received.

“Balancing the state’s right of surveillance and at the same time the right of privacy of individuals, we passed the judgment and obtained a report,” the bench said.

Sibal asked the bench to at least look at the US court judgment, and the redacted portion of the report must be given to the individuals concerned.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, also for the petitioner said that his client had placed on record, through an affidavit before the committee, how the phones were hacked.

“The state has used spyware against its own citizenry and it is established from the record. This is a very serious situation," Divan said.

He contended that it is not an allegation and he can show it with substantial proof through expert evidence on record.

Court Balances National Security and Right to Privacy in Pegasus Spyware Case

The bench said this may be an allegation. Divan said the committee report must be released to his client, some portions can be redacted, but the report should be available. “There is an open court system over here," he said.

The bench said it can think of disclosing the report to an individual, as the apprehension must be adequately responded to, and agreed to examine the US court judgment.

The court fixed the matter for hearing on July 30, 2025.

It allowed the petitioners to place on record a judgment pronounced by a US court in a case filed by WhatsApp against Pegasus.

The panel headed by retired Supreme Court judge R V Raveendran had submitted its report in the apex court in July, 2022 in pleas filed in 2021.

The court had then noted that the court-appointed Pegasus inquiry panel in its report said that there was no conclusive proof of the use of Israeli spyware in 29 mobile phones examined by it but the government of India did not cooperate in the probe.

The panel also found that five out of 29 mobile phones were possibly infected with some malware, but that did not mean it was Pegasus.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email