38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 22, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Offer by temples devotees not meant for constructing marriage halls,' SC refuses to stay HC order

By Jhanak Sharma      17 September, 2025 01:15 PM      0 Comments
Offer by temples devotees not meant for constructing marriage halls SC refuses to stay HC order

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has refused to stay a High Court's order which held temple funds couldn’t be treated as public or government funds, saying that the money offered by devotees was not meant for the construction of marriage halls.

Taking up the pleas challenging the Madras High Court's decision, a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said, “devotees do not offer their money to the temple for the purpose of setting up these marriage halls. It may be for the improvement of the temple.”

“If there is a marriage party going on in a temple's premises and all kinds of vulgar songs are played, is that the purpose of a temple's land,” the bench further asked.

The court felt that such money be utilised for charitable purposes such as education and towards medical institutions.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi and other lawyers were representing the petitioners.

The court said that the issue was whether the decision taken by the government was right or wrong.

It agreed to hear the challenge and fixed the matter for hearing on November 19.

"We will hear this matter. We are not granting any stay order to the petitioners,” the bench said.

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court had quashed the government orders allowing the construction of marriage halls with funds belonging to five temples at different locations in Tamil Nadu.

The high court, in an order passed on August 19, held that the government’s decision to construct marriage halls for rental purposes by giving them for wedding functions wasn’t within the definition of “religious purposes”.

In the high court, it was contended that the government had no jurisdiction to utilise temple funds or surplus funds for the construction of marriage halls under the provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act and its rules.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

superintend-of-police-not-liable-for-investigating-officers-negligence-in-not-filing-chargesheet-closure-report-on-time-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Superintend of Police Not Liable For Investigating Officer’s Negligence In Not Filing Chargesheet/Closure Report On Time: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court rules that Superintendents of Police cannot be held liable for Investigating Officers’ delay in filing chargesheets or closure reports.

21 November, 2025 10:25 AM
india-and-israel-sign-terms-of-reference-to-begin-free-trade-agreement-negotiations
Trending International
India and Israel Sign Terms of Reference to Begin Free Trade Agreement Negotiations

India and Israel sign Terms of Reference to launch Free Trade Agreement talks, aiming to boost trade, reduce barriers, and finalize the pact within 12–18 months.

21 November, 2025 11:27 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM
findings-based-on-assumptions-cannot-replace-evidence-sc-upholds-auction-sale-in-revenue-recovery-dispute
Trending Judiciary
“Findings Based on Assumptions Cannot Replace Evidence”: SC Upholds Auction Sale in Revenue Recovery Dispute [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds a 2005 revenue recovery auction, ruling that statutory remedies not invoked on time cannot be bypassed through writ jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 11:24 AM
delhi-hc-dismisses-ed-appeals-upholds-unfreezing-of-accounts-in-pmla-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Dismisses ED Appeals, Upholds Unfreezing of Accounts in PMLA Case [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds unfreezing of Poonam Malik’s bank accounts, ruling ED’s freezing orders were based on mere suspicion and violated mandatory PMLA safeguards.

17 November, 2025 11:43 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email