38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PAN not inoperative if not linked to Aadhaar till SCs verdict: Guj HC

By LawStreet News Network      23 January, 2020 11:01 PM      0 Comments
PAN not inoperative if not linked to Aadhaar till SCs verdict: Guj HC

The deadline for linking PAN with Aadhaar card has been extended several times and now the final date is decided as March 31, 2020. On January 23, 2020 the Gujarat High Court in one of its judgements stated that PAN not linked to Aadhaar shall not be inoperative till the Supreme Courts judgement on the constitutional validity of Aadhaar Act is given. 

The judgement was given by a single judge bench of Justice Harsha Devani. An appeal was filed recently in the Gujarat High Court by one Mr. Bandish Saurabh Soparkar seeking a declaration that he would not be in default in any proceedings only for the reason that the permanent account number (PAN) is not linked with Aadhaar or Aadhaar Number is not quoted. As per section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 every person who is allotted Permanent Account number should intimate his/her Aadhaar number to the Income Tax Department otherwise the that persons PAN shall be inoperative. The Gujarat High Court observed that the opinion of majority in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India case makes its application difficult to the present case and raises a potential conflict between the judgements of coordinate Benches. The court even observes that the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act is itself in question to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court. Counsel for the applicant submitted that due to the ambiguity in the decisions of the Supreme court and their reference to the larger bench makes the applicant have this case. 

The Court provided, its pointed out by the counsel for the applicant, on the question as to whether the Aadhaar Act was rightly introduced as a Money Bill, the Supreme Court vide its judgment & order made in case of Rojer Mathew V. South Indian Bank Ltd. has referred the issue for consideration by a larger bench. The validity of the Aadhaar Act therefore, has not attained finality

The Gujarat High Court judgement in the case of Bandish Saurabh Soparkar v. Union of India 2020states: PAN of applicant shall not be declared inoperative and applicant would not be in default in any proceedings only for reason that permanent account number is not linked with Aadhaar or Aadhaar number is not quoted and applicant shall not be subjected to proviso to sub-section (2) of section 139AA till judgment of Supreme Court in Roger Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. and others in Civil Application No. 8588 of 2019 is delivered and available.

Author: Mansi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email