38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Panchayati divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law : Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

By Gautami Chakravarty      09 February, 2021 05:29 PM      0 Comments
Panchayati divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law : Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

A Criminal Writ Petition was recently filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court u/A 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent to safeguard the lives of the petitioners by providing police help to the petitioners and further directing the respondent not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners whereby the Court considering the facts stated that the Panchayati Divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law.

However, with the petition itself, the judgment and decree passed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the case of petitioner No.2 has been attached which clearly goes to show that the petitioners are aware of the law.

Petitioner No.1 was earlier married to one Mandeep Kaur and had taken a Panchayati Divorce on 19.06.2017, whereas, petitioner No.2 was earlier married to one Harjinder Singh and had got a divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Learned counsel has also not been able to show as to how this Court can provide protection to the petitioners as a couple when petitioner No.1 has not legally divorced his earlier spouse. In fact, the alleged marriage itself between petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 would be illegal and against the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 inasmuch as this marriage has been contracted without petitioner No.1 being legally divorced.

The Petitioner in its contentions stated before the Court that they apprehended danger to their life and liberty. The petitioners approached this Court for protection of their life and liberty to live as a couple which cannot be considered in the facts and circumstances of the present case. It was hels that the present petition is not maintainable at the behest of the petitioners who have got married without petitioner No.1 being legally and validly divorced.

After the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, marriages and divorce qua Hindus is governed by the procedure as set out in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is a complete Code and provides for the conditions of marriage as well as the procedure for divorce. The contention of the learned counsel that petitioner No.1 had sought and got a Panchayati divorce is thus an argument that cannot be accepted.

As stated above, the petitioners, as individuals, would always be at liberty to approach the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police for redressal of their apprehensions regarding threats to their life and liberty.

An argument was raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are uneducated people and, hence, are not aware of the niceties of the law. In view of Section 4 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 all customs and usages ceased to have an effect.

The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are alleged to have got married without petitioner No.1 obtaining a legally valid divorce from his first wife. The relatives of petitioner No.2 are against the relationship of the petitioners. The Hindu Marriage Act was enacted in the year 1955. However, the petitioners have since got married on 21.01.2021 at Gurudwara as per Sikh rites and ceremonies. 

It was noted thus that the learned counsel was relying upon a Panchayati divorce which has no recognition in the eyes of law. 

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

beant-singh-assassination-case-sc-grants-four-weeks-more-time-to-centre-to-decide-mercy-plea-of-death-row-convict
Trending Judiciary
Beant Singh assassination case: SC grants four weeks more time to Centre to decide mercy plea of death row convict

SC grants Centre 4 more weeks to decide mercy plea of death row convict Balwant Singh Rajoana in Beant Singh assassination case, citing sensitivities.

25 November, 2024 11:25 AM
hindu-women-right-to-maintenance-found-in-shastric-hindu-law-sc
Trending Judiciary
Hindu Women’s right to maintenance found in Shastric Hindu law: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Hindu Women’s maintenance rights rooted in Shastric law, property given in lieu transforms into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of HSA, 1956.

25 November, 2024 11:49 AM

TOP STORIES

no-disciplinary-proceedings-allowed-against-employee-after-retirement-sc
Trending Judiciary
No disciplinary proceedings allowed against employee after retirement: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules disciplinary proceedings cannot start after employee’s retirement or extended service. SBI directed to release pending dues within six weeks.

20 November, 2024 03:47 PM
sc-restores-criminal-charges-against-kerala-mla-for-tampering-of-evidence-in-a-drug-case
Trending Judiciary
SC restores criminal charges against Kerala MLA for tampering of evidence in a drug case

SC revives criminal charges against Kerala MLA Antony Raju for tampering evidence in 1990 drug case; directs trial completion within a year.

20 November, 2024 04:02 PM
delhi-hc-directs-sbi-to-compensate-customer-in-cyber-fraud-case-emphasises-banks-responsibility-in-digital-security
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case, emphasises bank’s responsibility in digital security [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court directs SBI to compensate Rs. 2.60 lakh to a cyber fraud victim, emphasizing banks’ responsibility to ensure digital security and swift action.

20 November, 2024 04:06 PM
supreme-court-upholds-wifes-right-to-pre-divorce-living-standards-restores-rs-1-75-lakh-monthly-maintenance
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Upholds Wife’s Right to Pre-Divorce Living Standards, restores Rs. 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court restores Rs 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance, emphasizing a wife’s right to maintain pre-divorce living standards in landmark judgment.

20 November, 2024 04:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email