38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Parents being Harrased via SMS to pay the fees for the duration of lockdown: Plea alleges Before Allahabad High Court

By Nargis      02 April, 2021 08:38 PM      0 Comments
 Parents being Harrased via SMS to pay the fees for the duration of lockdown: Plea alleges Before Allahabad High Court

Another PIL has been filedwhich challenge the unreasonabily high and arbitary levy of fees by private schools in the state as the Government of Uttar Pradesh Government is still not able to reply to a query put forward by Allahabad High Court regarding the regulation of fees during the lockdown. 

The members of the Parents Association has filed the PIL after the parents as well as children are being harrased by the private schools especially through SMS and Whatsapp messages to pay the fees for the session 2020-2021, at time when the schools were closed and no services were provided due to the nationwide lockdown. 

The Advocates Shashwat Anand and Ankur Azad who have filed the petition on behalf the parents pointed out that the UP Self-finanacial Independent Schools (Fee Registration) Act, which was enacted in 2018 was put into practice to regulate the conduct of Private unaided schools and to put chains on  unreaslnable demands of fees by private institutions. 

Section 8 of the above act deals with the Constitution of " District Fee Regulatory Committee ". In order to deal with the issues like the fee charged by private schoolsand to hear complaints of students, parents, guardians is regulated by the committee. But in Uttar Pradesh no such committee is formed till date. 

Moreover, section 4(3) of the act empowers the state Government to regulate the fees of all the students who are studying in private schools for each acacdemic year for the sake of public interest, in exceptional conditions or situations arising unexpectedly like acts of God, Epidemics etc. This section was added to the act on June 17, 2020 by way of an ordinance. But the state Government has not provided the support to the parents in this time if hardships and distress. 

The plea claims that there is rarely any school in Moradabad District which is not harassing the parents as well as childern for fees, for the months when the lockdown was imposed through out the country. 

The petitioners allege that if the students are not able to pay the fee, the schools are not allowing them to attend the online  classes, nor the childern are alllowed to sit in the examination neither the childern are promoted to the higher standards. Even in some cases the schools are removing the names of such students from the school records. 

The plea states that for the sake of extracting illegal and unreasonably high fee from the children, and from their parents the private schools have not even separately specified the tuition fees and are taking the fees of all the heads as one head. By means of this, the schools are collecting the unreasonabily high and illegal school feesand are voilating the directions of the Government and blatant voilations of the mandate of the 2018 Act, which is not only ollegal, arbitrary and unethical, but also lacking the human qualities of compassion and mercy on part of the private schools. 

Additionally, the petitioners claimed that the whole burdon of finance for the "Online Tuition" has also been put on the parents which includes the cost of technological infrastructure, expenses of Internet, connection, Electricity bills etc.

In the case of  Sulekha and ors v State of UP and ors, earlier this year  this issue assumed importance, when the Cheif Justice led Bench of the High Court has asked the UP Government about the principle it shall follow for the regulation of fees under the UP self- financed Independent schools (Fee Regulation) Act 2018.This case  probably is to be  listed on 29th April 2021.

The issue may be read in the light of the observations made by the apex Court in T. M. A Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka. In this case, it was held that in setting up a reasonable fee structure, the element of unfair profit is not as yet accepted in Indian conditions. 

The fee structure should of that kind which takes into consideration the need to generate funds, which should be used for the improvement and growth of educational institution, the improvement of education in that institution and to provide necessary facilities for the benefit of students. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email