38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024

HC Rules Against Patanjali for Trademark Infringement; Imposes a Fine of Rs. 10 Lacs on the Company

By Tanurag Ghosh      08 August, 2020 03:03 PM      0 Comments
Patanjali for Trademark Infringement

The High Court of Mardas has ruled on a plea against Patanjali Ayurved for Trademark Infringement. It stated that Patanjali Ayurved founded cannot use ‘Coronil’ as the name of its product which it claimed was a cure for COVID-19. It ruled in favor of the petitioner, Ardura Engineering Pvt Ltd, a company based in Chennai. It pointed out that the Ayurved pharma giant could have done a “simple check with the Trademarks Registry” to check if ‘Coronil was a registered trademark, which it was.

Patanjali Ayurved was founded by Baba Ramdev, a famous Yoga guru in India with a considerable mass following. The company introduced its product ‘Coronil kit’ a few weeks ago which it claimed was a cure for COVID-19 infection. This was reportedly done without the requisite permissions and therefore on the same day, Union AYUSH ministry asked the company to stop marketing the product until it passed the Indian standards.

A shift in the stance came a few days after when the product was rebranded as an immunity booster when it failed to meet the claims of being a cure for the pandemic causing infection. 

Trademark infringement is defined under Section 29 of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Last month, Ardura filed a plea in the High Court claiming that it had the exclusive rights to this name (Coronil 92-B trademark) until 2027 and Patanjali breached them. The public record stated that this name was registered as Ardura’s trademark in June 1983. Following this information, the court passed interim orders which barred Patanjali from using this name on its product.

The bench of Justice CV Karthikeyan adjudicated the matter. It noted-

“The defendants have invited this litigation on themselves. A simple check with the Trademarks Registry would have revealed that 'Coronil' is a registered trademark," said Justice CV Karthikeyan in his order, "If they had, and had still, with audacity used the name 'Coronil', then they deserve no consideration at all. They cannot assume they can bulldoze their way and infringe a registered trademark.”

Elaborating on the judgment, Justice Karthikeyan said-

“They (Patanjali) must realize there is no equity in trade and commerce. If they had not done a check with the Registry, then they are at fault. They cannot plead ignorance and innocence and seek indulgence from this court. Either way, indulgence is refused.”

Moreover, the court also went on to fine Patanjali with a sum of Rs. 10 Lacs for exploiting fear and panic among the general public by projecting a coronavirus cure. It observed that these tablets were merely immunity boosters against cough, cold, and fever. Specific instructions were given which directed the company to pay this fine to organizations that are helping people in this critical period without seeking any recognition. Finally, the court ordered it to pay Rs. 5 lacs to Chennai’s Adyar Cancer Institute and the Government Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital because of these institutes’ benevolent gesture of treating patients for free without any claims.

Throughout the country, multiple FIRs and pleas have been filed in courts on different levels which show how Patanjali by moving hastily has breached multiple laws safeguarding citizens’ interest in these tough circumstances.


Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM
Trending Judiciary
Non-tear of the hymen is of no consequence in cases of penetrative sexual assault: Guwahati HC in POCSO case [Read Judgment]

Hymen tear or genital injuries are not a sine qua non to prove penetrative sexual assault, the Guwahati High Court has held in a case under the POCSO Act, 2012.

16 April, 2024 05:06 PM


Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email