38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Pay Arrears of Pension to Freedom Fighter's Widow from 1947': Himachal Pradesh High Court Directs Central Government

By Nargis Bano      25 August, 2021 01:39 PM      0 Comments
Himachal Pradesh High Court Directs Central Government

The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently dismissed the Central Government's appeal and ordered it to pay all pension arrears, including interest, to the widow of a freedom fighter beginning in 1974.

The order was issued by a division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Ravi Malimath and Justice Jyotsna Rewa Dua on an appeal filed by the Central Government, which challenged the order of a single judge on the petition.

Petitioner Brahmi Devi had asked the Centre and the state government to grant her a freedom fighter's pension because she was the widow of Dhani Ram, who served in the Dogra Regiment as a sepoy until 1946 and took part in World War II.

Dhani Ram, who received the Pacific Star, the Defence Medal, and the War Medal, was declared a national freedom fighter, along with others in similar positions.

Himachal Pradesh issued a letter in 1973 awarding Tamrapatras to freedom fighters in Bilaspur, Mandi, Hamirpur, and Kullu districts, and the petitioner's husband's name appeared on the list, along with another freedom fighter, Lance Naik Lashkari Ram.

Dhani Ram was awarded a Tamrapatra on August 15, 1973, after the Bilaspur Deputy Commissioner recognised him as a freedom fighter and issued him an identity card. However, the state did not take into account his request for a pension. He continued to make representations until his death on May 2, 2010. Following that, his widow pursued his claim.

On September 29, 2016, the single judge Bench granted her petition, stating that it is proved on record that the petitioner's husband was a freedom fighter and thus, she is entitled to the grant of freedom fighter pension from the due date, i.e. April 4, 1974.

It had ordered that the pension be released within eight weeks, or the respondents would be required to pay 9% interest on the pension.

It is worthy to note that Dhani Ram was awarded a Tamrapatra on August 15, 1973, after the Bilaspur Deputy Commissioner recognised him as a freedom fighter and issued an identity card to him. However, the state did not take into account his request for a pension.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email