38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 18, 2024
Judiciary

'Permission Of The Appropriate Consumer Forum Is Required For Filing A Complaint On Behalf Of Numerous Consumers': Supreme Court

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      20 September, 2021 12:31 PM      0 Comments
 'Permission Of The Appropriate Consumer Forum Is Required For Filing A Complaint On Behalf Of Numerous Consumers': Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has recently held that the consumer forum under whose jurisdiction the case falls has to provide permission to one or two consumers, having the same interest to file a consumer complaint. 

BACKGROUND

In the case of  Yogesh Aggarwal v. Aneja Consultancy, the  National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission ( NDRC) had entertained a complaint filed by the Investor Forum Aneja Group. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE APPELLANT

The appellant held that the commission, as per Section 2(1) (b) of the  Consumer Protection Act, 1986, could not have been entertained by the  National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission( NDRC).

The section defines the word “complainant” as a consumer, any voluntary consumer association registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or under any other law for the time being in force; or the Central Government or any State Government; or one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers having the same interest; or  in case of death of a consumer, his legal heir or representative;] who or which makes a complaint. 

Since the respondent does not fall under any of the criteria, therefore, the appeal is not maintainable. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE RESPONDENT

The respondent contended that the appeal was maintainable as it falls under the sub-section (iv) of Section 2(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, which states that the complainant is defined as one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers having the same interest. 

Therefore, the appeal is maintainable. 

JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT 

The bench of the Court consisting of Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian held that since the complaint was not maintainable as the appellant was neither a voluntary consumer association nor a registered body, nor the permission of the appropriate forum had been obtained by the court and therefore the  National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission (NDRC) could not entertain the issue in this case. 

JUDGEMENT OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION 

The appellant was ordered by the  National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission to pay a certain cheque signed by him along with 9% of interest p.a. 

JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT ON THE DIRECTION OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMSSION

It was held by the Court that the respondent is a sole proprietorship consultancy belonging to MR. I.J.Aneja, cannot depend on his employees to pay for the consultancy. The employees do not have any liability involved in this consultancy due to which they are not required to pay any amount to the consultancy under the order of the National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission (NDRC).

Furthermore, the complaint was not maintainable in the National Commission Dispute Redressal Commission (NDRC) from the beginning of the order.

PRESENT SCENARIO 

The appeal made by the appellants was allowed and the impugned order passed by the NDRC was set aside, dismissing the complaint. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

burden-to-prove-dishonest-damage-to-electric-meter-is-for-electricity-theft-is-on-the-prosecution-says-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Burden to prove dishonest damage to electric meter is for electricity theft, is on the prosecution: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court has held that the burden to prove that a person has ‘dishonestly’ damaged an electric meter to commit electricity theft is on the prosecution.

17 April, 2024 05:41 PM

TOP STORIES

two-day-conference-on-april-on-technology-and-dialogue-between-sc-and-singapore
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM
lsj-exclusive-interview-how-bjp-govt-will-free-chhattisgarh-from-naxal-menace
Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
sc-rejects-review-of-order-to-pay-rs-154-cr-compensation-to-ex-air-force-staff-for-transfusion-of-hiv-infected-blood
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
cji-cautions-against-overlooking-ethical-legal-consideration-on-use-of-ai-in-court-adjudication
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email