38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, January 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PSO Held Liable For Killing Judges Family In Broad Daylight In Gurugram

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2020 03:02 PM      0 Comments
PSO Held Liable For Killing Judges Family In Broad Daylight In Gurugram

On Thursday (February 6, 2020), the District and Sessions Court held that the Personal Security Officer (PSO) liable for killing the family members of a Judicial official in October 2018 after framing the charges against him last year. The decision was made by the Additional District and Sessions Judges Sudhir Parmar, pronouncing that the PSO Mahipal is guilty of murder and destruction of evidence under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and used arms in contravention of the law under the Arms Act, 1959. The Public Prosecutor Anurag Hooda congratulated the Gurugram Police for it's performance in collecting evidence which lead to the conviction in time. After the verdict, he said The then Commissioner of Police, K.K. Rao, constituted a Special Investigation Team soon after the incident leading to the arrest of the accused in less than two hours. The SIT was reconstituted the next day to add more police personnel to expedite the investigation and the collection of evidence. The prosecution produced 64 witnesses in which two were eye-witnesses, the CCTV footage and videos of the incident were doing the rounds on social media. There were bloodstains of the deceased Dhruv on the uniform of the accused who had also made an extra-judicial confession to the deceaseds father, Additional District and Sessions Judge Krishant Kant and co-PSO constable Vinay Kumar. 

It has been said by the prosecutor that they will claim for maximum punishment against the accused, under Section 302 of  Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as it falls under the ambit of the rarest of the rare cases. The defence lawyer said that the death was caused due to accidental firing during a scuffle between Mahipal and Dhruv and the case should be adjudged under Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder. They will appeal in higher courts against the Judgment. 

The report of the police mentions Singh was escorting Kants wife Ritu, 38, and son Dhruv, 18, to Arcadia Market when he shot them with his service revolver (.38 bore). He shot Ritu twice in the chest and stomach and Dhruv thrice, once on the shoulder and twice in the head.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM
madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email