38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No Petition Related to Industrial Disputes Will Be Listed if Exceptional Circumstances Are Not Disclosed: Delhi High Court Registry [READ ORDER]

By Neha Bharti      25 September, 2020 02:40 PM      0 Comments
Petition Delhi High Court Registry

The Registry of Delhi High Court has issued an office order states that no petition which is related to the industrial dispute will be listed only if the exceptional circumstances under which the petitioner seeks relief are not disclosed in the petition. 

The office order by the Registry has been issued to give effect to the judicial order passed by the Single Judge Bench of justices J R Midha on September 20, 2020, in the case of PTI Employees Union v. Press Trust of India Ltd. W.P.(C) 10605/2018, wherein he said that "if the writ petition does not disclose the "Exceptional Circumstances" in the writ petition the registry shall return the writ petition under objection to enable the writ petition to disclose the Exceptional Circumstances in the synopsis as well as in the opening paragraphs of the writ petition". 

Moreover, the Court has recommended that the order which is subject to the approval of the Chief Justice the Registry can also incorporate the following column in the checklist of writ petitions "Whether the writ petition has an alternate remedy? If so disclose the exceptional circumstances which may warrant the exercise of writ jurisdiction in the Synopsis as well as in the opening paragraphs of the writ petition?

The Court has highlighted the sole test which is laid down by the Supreme Court for entertaining a writ petition related to the industrial dispute in the exercise of 'Exceptional Circumstances'. 

The Court also said that "it is a well-settled law by the Supreme Court that writ petition should not be entertained in respect of industrial dispute for which a statutory remedy is already available under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 unless exceptional circumstances are made out. The Supreme Court has also explained that if the writ petition involves a disputed question of fact the writ petition should not be entertained. The writ jurisdiction is a discretionary jurisdiction and discretion should not ordinarily be exercise if there is an alternative remedy available to petitioner"

With reference to this order, the registry has given clarification that if the writ petition does not disclose the exceptional circumstances in the writ petition the registry will return such petition under objection.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email