38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

P&H High Court grants protection to same-sex live-in couple stating that legitimacy is of no consequence vis--vis their right to life and liberty [READ ORDER]

By Saumya Srivastava      23 July, 2020 04:39 PM      0 Comments
PH High Court protection same-sex live-in couple

On Monday (20th July) the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed, social ethos, outlook and the philosophy appear to be evolving amongst gay couples so as to gather courage and openly come out of their closets.

The bench of Justice Arun Monga noted that even though gay marriage is not yet legitimate in the country as per the applicable marriage laws, the live-in relationships are becoming common.

The writ petition was filed by two females residing as a live-in couple, praying for the protection of their life and liberty against threats of their families. The petition was being heard by a Single Judge Bench.

The Bench was informed that both the females were majors and had a liking for each other. They have been in a live-in relationship for the last six months and residing in a common accommodation.

Justice Monga recorded that the petitioners have the knowledge of the fact that their relationship is not in the nature of marriage as they belong to the same sex. It was urged before the court that representation for protection had been filed earlier this month before the police but no action has been taken on that.

Justice Monga remarked, It seems that both the petitioners have prompted to file the instant petition thinking that live-in relationship between the same sex as a couple is not a criminality.

The bench further said that what could probably be coming in the way of the petitioners is the social unacceptability of their relationship by their parents/family members, due to which they have to live under constant fear.

The Bench did not comment on the legality of their relationship and was of the view that the petitioners are entitled to the protection of their lives and liberty as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, regardless of their relationship with each other.

Even if it is assumed that they were living together simply as friends, they are constitutionally entitled to live in peace, the bench observed. It further added that the legitimacy of their relationship with each other, therefore, is of no consequence vis-a-vis their right to life and liberty.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali to look into their representation for protection of their life and liberty.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-brutal-stabbing-of-woman-advocate-missing-children-hospital-refusal-under-scanner
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Brutal Stabbing of Woman Advocate; Missing Children, Hospital Refusal Under Scanner

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Delhi lawyer stabbing case, orders probe into hospital denial and directs police to trace two missing children.

27 April, 2026 04:56 PM
west-bengal-elections-calcutta-hc-expands-motorcycle-restrictions-bars-group-riding
Trending Judiciary
West Bengal Elections Calcutta HC Expands Motorcycle Restrictions, Bars Group Riding [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court bars group motorcycle riding from two days before West Bengal polling, modifying Single Judge order on CEO’s appeal.

28 April, 2026 05:10 PM
mere-absence-of-results-in-hair-treatment-cannot-prove-medical-negligence-or-deficiency-in-service-ncdrc-sets-aside-orders-against-dermatologist-plastic-surgeon-and-lifecell-international
Trending Judiciary
Mere Absence of Results in Hair Treatment Cannot Prove Medical Negligence or Deficiency in Service: NCDRC Sets Aside Orders Against Dermatologist, Plastic Surgeon, and Lifecell International [Read Order]

NCDRC rules that failure of PRP hair treatment alone does not prove negligence, sets aside compensation orders against doctors and Lifecell International.

28 April, 2026 05:51 PM
sc-upholds-translocation-of-deer-from-hauz-khas-deer-park-to-rajasthan-tiger-reserves-directs-moefcc-to-grant-statutory-status-to-cec-wildlife-translocation-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Translocation of Deer from Hauz Khas Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves; Directs MoEFCC to Grant Statutory Status to CEC Wildlife Translocation Guidelines [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds deer translocation from Hauz Khas to Rajasthan reserves; directs MoEFCC to grant statutory status to CEC guidelines.

28 April, 2026 05:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email