38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

P&H High Court grants protection to same-sex live-in couple stating that legitimacy is of no consequence vis--vis their right to life and liberty [READ ORDER]

By Saumya Srivastava      23 July, 2020 04:39 PM      0 Comments
PH High Court protection same-sex live-in couple

On Monday (20th July) the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed, social ethos, outlook and the philosophy appear to be evolving amongst gay couples so as to gather courage and openly come out of their closets.

The bench of Justice Arun Monga noted that even though gay marriage is not yet legitimate in the country as per the applicable marriage laws, the live-in relationships are becoming common.

The writ petition was filed by two females residing as a live-in couple, praying for the protection of their life and liberty against threats of their families. The petition was being heard by a Single Judge Bench.

The Bench was informed that both the females were majors and had a liking for each other. They have been in a live-in relationship for the last six months and residing in a common accommodation.

Justice Monga recorded that the petitioners have the knowledge of the fact that their relationship is not in the nature of marriage as they belong to the same sex. It was urged before the court that representation for protection had been filed earlier this month before the police but no action has been taken on that.

Justice Monga remarked, It seems that both the petitioners have prompted to file the instant petition thinking that live-in relationship between the same sex as a couple is not a criminality.

The bench further said that what could probably be coming in the way of the petitioners is the social unacceptability of their relationship by their parents/family members, due to which they have to live under constant fear.

The Bench did not comment on the legality of their relationship and was of the view that the petitioners are entitled to the protection of their lives and liberty as provided under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, regardless of their relationship with each other.

Even if it is assumed that they were living together simply as friends, they are constitutionally entitled to live in peace, the bench observed. It further added that the legitimacy of their relationship with each other, therefore, is of no consequence vis-a-vis their right to life and liberty.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali to look into their representation for protection of their life and liberty.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email