38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Photographs Taken from Instagram Posted on Porn Website: Delhi HC Issues Immediate Content Removal Orders [READ ORDER]

By Manthan Pandit      20 July, 2020 01:09 PM      0 Comments
Photographs Instagram Porn Website DelhiHC

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Police to take prompt action to take down photographs of a woman posted on a pornographic website without her consent. 

The Single Bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani also referred the case to the Cyber Security Awareness and Detection Unit (CyPAD), as the agency is fully prepared to deal with cybercrime matters.

The order came in a plea moved by a woman (confidential identity) who alleged that the pictures she shared on 'Instagram' and 'Facebook' were mischievously and unlawfully lifted and put on a derogatory captioned porn website.

Mr. Sarthak Maggon, who appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, submitted that the Respondent portal was a bogus website containing pornographic content and that the competent authorities should have banned and removed it from the world wide web.

Mr. Maggon further submitted that the said website was put without authorization, unlawfully and in complete violation of the provisions of the 2002 Information Technology Act and the Indian Penal Code.

Photographs of Petitioner on that website which causes her deep distress, anxiety, and embarrassment.

Further, it was submitted that by reason of the inaction on the part of the authorities, these photographs had already received 15,000 views.

She had also made a report online to the DCP South West, Delhi on 11th July 2020, but to no avail in this regard.

Mr. Maggon has also requested that Facebook Inc., which owns Instagram, will also be held accountable for the privacy and information security policies, terms, and conditions.

Mr. Rahul Mehra, who appeared for the Delhi Government, submitted that urgent and immediate measures would be taken to first remove the photographs of the petitioner posted to the errant website and, subsequently, to identify and prosecute the perpetrators, appropriate investigations would be carried out.

The court provided notices to the Central Government, the Delhi Government and the Indian Association of Internet Service Providers in view of these submissions. 

All respondents were asked to apply their counter-affidavits within three weeks. 

The court will take the matter up next on 30th July 2020.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email