38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea in High Court Against Delhi Governments Decision to Seal Borders

By Saumya Srivastava      05 June, 2020 12:02 PM      0 Comments
Plea in High Court Delhi Government

A lawyer has approached the Delhi High Court challenging AAP-led governments decision to seal the borders for 1 week amid the ongoing coronavirus induced lockdown.

The plea was filed by advocate Kushagra Kumar on the grounds that It is an illogical, irrational, unreasonable and unconstitutional order and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India

It is likely to be heard on 4th June.

Kumar, in his petition, said, Delhi being the national capital of India, has centrally funded hospitals like AIIMS and by sealing the borders, the government is taking away the rights of those who work in Delhi and stay in NCR of availing such health facilities. It also said that the decision leads the citizens of other states like Uttar Pradesh and Haryana to be denied their basic right to access the central hospital in Delhi.

In India, we do not have dual citizenship. Everyone is a citizen of this country and has the right to reside in any place and avail medical facilities in any place/s which he/she can afford, the plea said.

It also said, instead of creating medical infrastructure and ensuring medical facilities, it is sealing the borders and stopping people from availing medical facilities in Central hospital in Delhi.

The order of the Delhi government is inhuman and illegal, according to the appeal.

It further stated, By sealing the border, those working in Delhi & staying in NCR like Noida & Gurugram & those staying in different states like Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, etc, cannot avail the health facilities provided by the Central government in Delhi.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email