38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Police officers in all States to verify credentials of govt jobs aspirants within 6 months: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      07 December, 2024 09:29 PM      0 Comments
Police officers in all States to verify credentials of govt jobs aspirants within 6 months SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ordered police officials of all the state governments to check and verify documents pertaining to the character, antecedents, nationality, genuineness produced by the candidates selected for government jobs not later than a period of six months from the date of their appointment.

A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and R Mahadevan issued the direction also stating only upon verification of the credentials of the candidates, their appointments will have to be regularised so as to avoid further complications.

Supreme Court Mandates Background Check for Govt Job Selections

The court here set aside the Calcutta High Court's judgment of August 16, 2023 which allowed the West Bengal government's writ petition against the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal's decision quashing termination of an ophthalmic assistant, Basudev Datta two months prior to the date of his retirement and 25 years of service.

The petitioner joined the public service on March 6, 1985, but the verification report was communicated by the police to the department only on July 7, 2010, only two months prior to the date of retirement on the ground that he was not citizen of the country.

Govt Job Appointments Subject to Police Verification, Rules Supreme Court

The appellant claimed his nationality as Indian on the strength of the migration certificate on May 19, 1969 issued in favour of his father. His family has migrated from East Pakistan, now Bangladesh.

The court pointed out the provisions relating to citizenship are enshrined in Part II of the Constitution of India under Articles 5 to 11. Section 4 of the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955, entitles the appellant’s father to be treated as a citizen by descent. The appellant is also entitled to citizenship by registration as per Section 5 of the Act.

The court also cited Citizenship Amendment Act, 2020 which stated that the persons like the appellant herein are not be treated as “illegal migrants”. Once an application has been submitted, the authority concerned has to take appropriate decision within a reasonable time by taking into consideration all the applicable laws and the documents produced by the appellant. However, no decision has been taken against the appellant, the bench said.

While examining the matter, the court held that the order of termination passed against the appellant was arbitrary, illegal and violative of the principles of natural justice, which cannot be sustained.

The bench found that the tribunal was right in observing that the appellant was terminated without following the principles of natural justice and without affording any opportunity to explain his case before it.

In the case, the bench noted in all these documents, including the show cause notice, no reason was mentioned as to why the appellant was considered as ‘unsuitable’ for employment to the post. Furthermore, the alleged police verification report was not served on the appellant.

Emphasising reasons are heartbeat of every order and every notice, the bench said, "Every administrative or quasi-judicial order must contain the reasons. Such reasons go a long way in not only ensuring that the authority has applied his mind to the facts and the law, but also provide the grounds for the aggrieved party to assail the order in the manner known to law."

The court pointed out in the absence of any reasons, it also possesses a difficulty for the judicial authorities to test the correctness of the order or in other words, exercise its power of judicial review.

The bench also said the failure to furnish the documents referred and relied in the notice would vitiate the entire proceedings as being arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice.

In the case of appellant, the court noted no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the appellant to defend his stand effective before passing the termination order.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email