38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Political Parties Can Put Up Hoardings at Private Properties with Owners Consent: Patna High Court [Read Order]

By Pavitra Shetty      24 October, 2020 08:56 PM      0 Comments
Political Parties Can Put Up Hoardings at Private Properties with Owners Consent: Patna High Court [Read Order]

The Patna High Court consisting of a single bench of Justice Ashutosh Kumar held that only individual candidates can raise their hoardings after obtaining the written consent of the owner or occupier of the property.

It further said that this will benefit the intention of the legislature in enacting the Defacement of Property Act, 1987.

 The issue of putting up hoardings arose because of the writ petition filed by Century Business Pvt. Ltd engaged by the Bhartiya Janta Party to put up to 950 hoardings on private properties as part of the election campaign in Bihar.

The company then asked for permission from the chief electoral officer with permission of the owners, but it was rejected stating that the owner of private property can give written consent only to persons contesting the election.

It is clearly specified under section 3(3) Defacement of Property, 1987.

It was further held that this statue of Defacement of Property, 1987 is to be interpreted in a literal sense.

The company who are the petitioners, in this case, said that any person who contests election either does it independently or under the banner of any political party and hence the above argument of the respondent does not stand justified.

Petitioner-company also pointed out that in the State of Jharkhand also, there is similar local law with respect to defacement of property, and the Chief Electoral Officer, of Jharkhand, permitted it.

 The court held that the expression person would include political parties.

 The court analyzed the purpose behind the enactment of the local law regarding defacement is to prevent defacement and also to limit the squandering of money in restoring the property.

 The court further added that even in States where there is no local law on the subject of defacement of property, the Model Code of Conduct insists on doing minimum damage or de damage or defacement of public/private properties.

The Court agreed with the Petitioner's contention that when political parties were permitted to put up hoardings in Jharkhand then no two standards can be applied in interpreting an Act or Rule in two different States.

 Regarding the rules of interpretation of a statute, the court said that the golden rule of construction is to be preferred first but subject to the caveat that if any mischief is caused while strictly interpreting the rule there would be no harm in reading it down by infusing practically into the rule in question.

 the Defacement of Property Act, 1987 was implemented because in the past that during the elections many political parties indulged in defacement of public as well as private buildings by sticking posters without permission of the owner of the buildings and the cost of removing the posters was to be borne by them and to avoid it the act was passed.

Defacement, under the Act, is defined as impairing, damaging, disfiguring, and spoiling. 

Section 3 of Defacement of Property, 1987 act prescribes that any person guilty of defacement shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be extended to six months o or with fine, which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-hear-plea-on-august-8-seeking-time-bound-restoration-of-statehood-to-jammu-and-kashmir
Trending Judiciary
SC to Hear Plea on August 8 Seeking Time-Bound Restoration of Statehood to Jammu & Kashmir

SC to hear plea on Aug 8 seeking time-bound restoration of statehood to J&K, citing violation of federalism and delay despite govt assurance.

05 August, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-cancels-bail-of-ex-dhfl-promoter-dheeraj-wadhawan-in-42000-crore-bank-fraud-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Bail of Ex-DHFL Promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 Crore Bank Fraud Case

SC cancels bail of ex-DHFL promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 cr bank loan scam case; directs him to surrender within 2 weeks despite medical plea.

05 August, 2025 05:34 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-directs-telangana-speaker-to-decide-disqualification-petitions
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months [Read Order]

SC orders Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification pleas against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months, stressing swift action on political defections.

31 July, 2025 04:58 PM
sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM
electronic-communication-not-valid-mode-of-service-of-notice-under-section-35-bnss-sc
Trending Judiciary
Electronic communication not valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 BNSS: SC [Read Order]

SC holds WhatsApp or email not valid for notice under Section 35 BNSS due to arrest risk; personal service required to safeguard liberty.

01 August, 2025 11:25 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email