38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Promotion to post of district judges can't be only on the basis of merit list: SC [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      16 January, 2025 04:03 PM      0 Comments
Promotion to post of district judges cant be only on the basis of merit list SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said promotion to the post of district judges cannot be made only on the basis of merit list prepared on the basis of limited competitive examination as part of the selection process.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma concurred with a plea by the appellants who cited SC judgment in case of Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta and Another Vs High Court of Gujarat and Others (2024) to assert that in similar circumstances in respect of similar criteria, this court has held that the suitability of each candidate has to be tested on his own merit and a comparative assessment cannot be made and the promotion cannot be solely based upon merit list.

SC Rules Merit Lists Alone Insufficient for District Judge Promotions

The court allowed a contention by appellants Dharmendra Kumar Singh and others, holding they have successfully qualified the suitability test conducted by the Jharkhand High Court, so they could not have been deprived of their legitimate right of promotion only on account of lower placement in the merit list.

"The appellants are certainly entitled for promotion from the same date the other officers from the select list prepared by the High Court of Jharkhand have been appointed to the post of district judge in terms of notification of May 30, 2019," the bench said.

With this, the bench set aside the High Court judgment.

Supreme Court Upholds Suitability Test in Judicial Promotions

The court directed that the appellants would be entitled for notional promotion from the date other officers have been promoted to the post of district judge in terms of notification of May 30, 2019.

"They shall also be entitled for all consequential service benefits, including, seniority, increments, notional pay fixation etc., however, they shall not be entitled for any back wages," the bench clarified.

Following a notification issued on May 19, 2018 for appointment in the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service, the appellants, appointed initially as civil judge (junior division), participated in the selection process, governed by Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rule, 2001.

In the limited competitive examinations, the cut off marks for determining suitability of a candidate for promotion was fixed as 40 marks.

Though the appellants obtained more than 40 marks, the persons, junior to them were promoted by preparing a merit list and by promoting those who have more marks than the appellants.

The appellants approached the  High Court, for quashing the promotion list but their plea was  dismissed on the ground that the last selected candidate got 51 marks and of the three appellants, two got 50 marks, and another 43 marks.
 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email