38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 27, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Public Health More Important than Counting Votes': Madras High Court Suggests Lockdown on May 1 & 2 [READ ORDER]

By Snehal Khemka      29 April, 2021 02:18 PM      0 Comments
Public Health More Important than Counting Votes

The Madras High Court on Monday, April 26, 2021 heard amatter pertaining to the state of preparedness in the wake of the pandemic in the State of Tamil Nadu and in the Union Territory of Puducherry and issued a slew of suggestions regarding COVID management in the state of Tamil Nadu & UT of Puducherry.

It said, " You had all of last year to plan and take a decision. If it had been done, we would not be in this situation. We were lulled into a false sense of security only to be hit by this tsunami of infection now." 

The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthil Ramamoorthy remarked that  if only the authorities had made proper plans and taken measures during last one year, the present 'tsunami of COVID19 infections could have been avoided.

The State argued that the patients were directly being brought into government hospitals or private nursing homes and beds are sought when, in several cases, the patient may not require admission at all. Additionally, a number of patients were scrambling to obtain the drug Remdesivir which was, admittedly, in short supply.

It was submitted on behalf of the State that in most cases even admission may not be necessary and the State and the public interest would be better served if an element of discretion were exercised and the protocol that is being announced by the State, over and over again, was followed.

As far as the supplies of oxygen, Remdesivir and related drugs, ventilators, beds, doses of vaccine is concerned, the Court found that the status report filed by the State Government painted quite an acceptable picture.

However, the State did accept before the Court that if the upward trend continued, in the sense that more people get infected today than yesterday and yesterday was more than the day before, further measures have to be adopted. 

More importantly the State said that though there was adequate supply of oxygen at the moment, the State was not inclined to have oxygen diverted to anywhere else since the daily use of oxygen has been on the rise and, in a worst-case scenario, all of the available oxygen in the State may be necessary.

In this backdrop, the Court also noted that more oxygen and more ventilators would be necessary along with a greater supply of medicines to treat the symptoms in coming days when the COVID cases would rise. Further, underlining that Remdesivir was not meant for everyday use by every person, nor was it a cure for Covid-19, the State Government submitted that there was a sufficient supply of such drugs such as Tocilizumab 400mg and Enoxaparian 40mg which are also used in the treatment of Covid-19.

Further, on the suggestions of the Court, the State Government agreed to widely publicize the do's and don'ts and the other steps that may be taken or not taken by issuing advertisements in the print and electronic media for dissemination of information to the public at large. 

Relevant information is already available, according to the State, on the State website,  www.stopcorona.tn.gov.in and the Health Secretary promised that real-time information would be made available, indicating the availability of beds in the locality and the likes.

Lastly, stating that " Public health, after all, is more important than counting votes. The process may be delayed or even deferred, but public health must not be compromised," the Madras High Court, in its order, observed that both Tamil Nadu and Puducherry needed to be particularly aware of the fact that counting of votes will be undertaken from the early hours of May 2, 2021, and the counting activities must be held in complete Covid protocol, without any compromise at all.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-pronounces-judgment-on-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarna-kanta-sharma-in-liquor-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Pronounces Judgment on Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma in Liquor Policy Case

Delhi High Court rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea, holding allegations of bias against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma insufficient in liquor policy case.

21 April, 2026 11:16 AM
sc-dismisses-umar-khalids-review-petition-against-judgment-denying-bail-in-delhi-riots-larger-conspiracy-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Umar Khalid’s Review Petition Against Judgment Denying Bail in Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court dismisses Umar Khalid’s review plea against bail denial in Delhi riots conspiracy case, finding no grounds to interfere with its earlier judgment.

21 April, 2026 11:58 AM
nashik-court-denies-interim-arrest-protection-to-nida-ejaz-khan-in-tcs-bpo-harassment-case-bail-hearing-set-for-april-27
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Nashik Court Denies Interim Arrest Protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO Harassment Case; Bail Hearing Set for April 27

Nashik Court denies interim arrest protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO harassment case; anticipatory bail hearing adjourned to April 27.

21 April, 2026 01:37 PM
legal-representatives-remedy-against-arbitral-award-lies-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-under-article-227-of-the-constitution-sc
Trending Judiciary
Legal Representative’s Remedy Against Arbitral Award Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Not Under Article 227 of the Constitution: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules legal heirs must challenge arbitral awards under Section 34, not Article 227, affirming Arbitration Act as a complete code.

21 April, 2026 01:51 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email