38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Public prosecutor not to be appointed on political considerations: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      31 January, 2025 03:29 PM      0 Comments
Public prosecutor not to be appointed on political considerations SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has held the Haryana government as liable to pay Rs 5 lakh each as compensation to three persons for their unlawful imprisonment in a murder case, emphasising that the public prosecutor must be appointed solely on merit, not on political considerations, or by favouritism and nepotism.

SC Slams Political Appointments of Public Prosecutors, Orders ₹5L Compensation Each for Wrongful Conviction

A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan noted the public prosecutor failed to assist the High Court in arriving at correct decision.

"Judges are human beings and at times they do commit mistakes. The sheer pressure of work at times may lead to such errors. At the same time, the defence counsel as well as the public prosecutor owes a duty to correct the court if the court is falling in some error and for all this," the bench said.

Haryana Govt Liable for Unlawful Imprisonment, SC Emphasizes Merit-Based Prosecutor Appointments

In its judgment on January 29, 2025, the bench allowed appeals filed by Mahavir and others, and set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment of August 27, 2024, which held them guilty in a 1998 murder case.

Having gone through facts of the matter, the bench said, "It is as clear as a noonday that the High Court committed an egregious error in reversing the acquittal and passing an order of conviction in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction and that too without affording any opportunity of hearing to the appellants herein."

The appellants, who were in their 60s and 70s, contended they suffered unjust imprisonment for over three months until they were granted bail by the Supreme Court on December 13, 2024 in the case.

Their counsel contended the High Court reversed the order of acquittal, on a revision petition filed by the father of the deceased, 26 years after the incident and 20 years after the trial court's judgment, in view of failure of the public prosecutor to render proper assistance.

Concurring with the submission, the bench held the state government responsible. "It is the state government who appointed the concerned public
prosecutor. The state government should be asked to pay compensation to the three appellants herein," the bench said.

The court pointed out the object of the CrPC and the rules is to appoint the best among the lawyers as the public prosecutor to provide assistance to the court.

It said the law officers are one of the important wheels of the chariot, driven by the judges to attain the cherished goal of human being to secure justice against the wrong doers.

In the year 2006 when the judgement of acquittal was passed, the de facto complainant had no right to challenge by way of filing the appeal, the court said.

"The 2009 amendment made in Section 372 CrPC created a substantive right of appeal for the victim but this is not retrospective in nature," the bench said.

In the case, the bench said, the most distrubing feature was that the public prosecutor instead of assisting the HC in the right direction by pointing out the correct position of law went to the extent of demanding the capital punishment.

"Such is the standard of the public prosecutors in the High Courts of the country. This is bound to happen when the state governments across the country appoint AGPs and APPs in their respective High Courts solely on political considerations. Favouritism and nepotism is one additional factor for compromising merit," the bench said.

The court said this judgement is a message to all the state governments that the AGPs and APPs in respective High Courts should be appointed solely on the merit of the person.

"The state government owes a duty to ascertain the ability of the person; how proficient the person is in law, his overall background, his integrity etc," the bench said.

The court finally directed the Haryana government to pay Rs 5 lakh each to three appellants within four weeks.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email