38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Pune Porsche Crash: SC Grants Bail to Three Accused in Blood Sample Tampering Case

By Samriddhi Ojha      02 February, 2026 06:32 PM      0 Comments
Pune Porsche Crash SC Grants Bail to Three Accused in Blood Sample Tampering Case

New Delhi: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Three Accused in Pune Porsche Blood-Sample Tampering Case

The Supreme Court of India on February 2, 2026, granted bail to three persons accused of tampering with and swapping blood samples in connection with the May 19, 2024 Pune Porsche crash—a high-profile incident that claimed the lives of two young software professionals.

A Bench of Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan ordered the release of Aditya Avinash Sood, Ashish Satish Mittal, and Amar Santosh Gaikwad on conditions to be framed by the trial court, noting that they had been in custody for around 18 months amid prolonged undertrial detention with limited progress in the trial.

The three accused were alleged to have conspired to replace the blood samples of two minor passengers in the Porsche with their own samples in order to conceal alcohol consumption by the minors and thereby shield the investigation into the deadly crash. According to the prosecution, Sood provided his blood sample in place of his minor son’s, Mittal substituted his sample for that of another minor, and Gaikwad acted as a middleman who allegedly received ₹3 lakh to facilitate the swap. They face charges under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery and tampering with evidence, as well as under the Prevention of Corruption Act for bribery.

While granting bail, the Supreme Court emphasised that there can be no punishment before conviction and expressed concern that the accused had already spent significant time in custody while the trial had seen little advancement, with many prosecution witnesses yet to be examined. The Bench directed that bail conditions must include prohibitions on contacting witnesses, warning that any violation could lead to cancellation of bail.

While delivering the order, the Court also made broader observations on parental responsibility, noting that allowing minors access to high-speed luxury vehicles and alcohol reflected a serious failure of supervision. It observed that substance abuse by minors and reckless behaviour have tragic consequences and stressed that parental disengagement cannot substitute proper guidance and control.

Background of the Porsche Crash and Subsequent Investigation

The case arises from a fatal accident on May 19, 2024, when an unregistered Porsche car, allegedly driven at high speed by a 17-year-old under the influence of alcohol, struck a motorcycle in Kalyani Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, killing Aneesh Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta. The deceased were young IT professionals returning from a night out.

The crash triggered nationwide outrage, not only due to the loss of life but also because of the initial handling of the case. The juvenile driver was granted bail by a Juvenile Justice Board within hours, subject to conditions including writing an essay on road safety and undergoing counselling—an order that drew widespread criticism. Subsequent police investigations allegedly uncovered evidence manipulation, including delayed blood-alcohol testing and swapping of blood samples of minors present in the car. Several individuals, including doctors, hospital staff, parents of the minors, and intermediaries, were arrested and charged.

In December 2025, the Bombay High Court had rejected bail applications of several accused, observing that granting bail to financially well-placed persons could risk witness tampering and obstruction of justice. The Supreme Court has now overturned that denial, citing prolonged custody and delays in the trial.

Case Details:

Case Title: Ashish Satish Mittal v. State of Maharashtra
Bench: Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan
Order Date: February 2, 2026
Accused Released on Bail:

  • Aditya Avinash Sood
  • Ashish Satish Mittal
  • Amar Santosh Gaikwad


Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-refuses-stay-on-adanis-jal-plan-nclat-to-hear-vedanta-appeal
Trending Business
SC Refuses Stay on Adani’s JAL Plan; NCLAT to Hear Vedanta Appeal

Supreme Court refuses to stay Adani’s JAL resolution plan, asks NCLAT to hear Vedanta’s appeal on priority in the high-stakes insolvency dispute.

06 April, 2026 01:31 PM
sc-orders-cbi-probe-into-alleged-irregular-allotment-of-contracts-linked-to-arunachal-pradesh-cm-pema-khandus-family
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders CBI Probe into Alleged Irregular Allotment of Contracts Linked to Arunachal Pradesh CM Pema Khandu’s Family

Supreme Court orders CBI probe into alleged irregular allotment of public works contracts linked to Arunachal CM Pema Khandu’s family.

06 April, 2026 02:39 PM

TOP STORIES

dhcba-announces-abstention-from-work-on-1st-and-3rd-saturdays-opposes-delhi-high-courts-mandatory-sitting-days
Trending Judiciary
DHCBA Announces Abstention from Work on 1st and 3rd Saturdays, Opposes Delhi High Court’s Mandatory Sitting Days [Read Notice]

DHCBA announces abstention from work on 1st and 3rd Saturdays, citing difficulties with Delhi High Court’s mandatory Saturday sittings.

02 April, 2026 01:02 PM
aap-removes-raghav-chadha-as-rajya-sabha-deputy-leader
Trending Executive
AAP Removes Raghav Chadha as Rajya Sabha Deputy Leader

AAP removes Raghav Chadha as Rajya Sabha Deputy Leader, bars him from speaking time; Ashok Mittal appointed amid major internal reshuffle.

02 April, 2026 05:51 PM
husbands-obligation-to-maintain-wife-does-not-extinguish-upon-his-death-allahabad-hc-affirms-widowed-daughter-in-laws-right-to-seek-maintenance-from-father-in-law
Trending Judiciary
“Husband’s Obligation to Maintain Wife Does Not Extinguish Upon His Death”: Allahabad HC Affirms Widowed Daughter-in-Law’s Right to Seek Maintenance from Father-in-Law [Read Judgment]

Allahabad HC rules widowed daughter-in-law can seek maintenance from father-in-law; husband’s obligation does not end with death.

02 April, 2026 05:56 PM
delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-injunction-to-protect-aniruddhacharya-ji-maharajs-personality-rights-against-ai-deepfakes
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Ex-Parte Injunction to Protect Aniruddhacharya Ji Maharaj’s Personality Rights Against AI Deepfakes [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants injunction against AI deepfakes misusing Aniruddhacharya Ji Maharaj’s persona; directs platforms to remove content.

02 April, 2026 06:49 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email