38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Push for Transparency,' SC judges put assets details in public domain [Read Press Release]

By Jhanak Sharma      06 May, 2025 12:08 PM      0 Comments
Push for Transparency SC judges put assets details in public domain

NEW DELHI: Of 33 sitting judges in the Supreme Court, a total of 21 have declared their assets, including of their spouse, in a move enhancing transparency in the judiciary.

After a full court resolution of April 1, the judges declared their full assets on Monday night, on the Supreme Court's website.

In terms of the details uploaded on the SC website, outgoing Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna has a three-bedroom DDA flat in South Delhi, a four-bedroom flat/apartment with two parking spaces in Commonwealth Games Village, Delhi, measuring 2446 sq ft super area. He has 56% share in four-bedroom flat/apartment in Sispal Vihar, Sector 49, Gurugram, measuring 2016 sq ft super area. He is also having his share in Dev Raj Khanna (HUF), part owner of house with undivided share in land at Dalhousie, Himachal Pradesh.

As per his disclosure, he has Rs 55.75 lakh in fixed deposits and bank accounts and Rs 1.06 crore in Public Provident Fund (PPF- Account opened in the year 1989). He has GPF of Rs 1,77,89,000. He has got LIC Money Back Policy with yearly premium of Rs 29,625 and Shares of Rs 14,000.

The CJI, who is to demit office on superannuation on May 13, has no liabilities and loan on him.

The CJI-designate, Justice B R Gavai, has Rs 19.63 lakh in bank accounts and Rs 6.59 lakh in his PPF account. He has a residential house at Amravati, Maharashtra (inherited from deceased father), a residential apartment at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra (self) and a residential apartment in Defence Colony, New Delhi (self).

Justice Gavai has also agricultural land at Amravati, Maharashtra, and at Kedapur and Katol, Nagpur, (inherited from deceased father).

Justice Surya Kant, who is to succeed Justice Gavai as the CJI, has one kanal house in Sector 10, Chandigarh (jointly owned by Self/Spouse/HUF), 13 and half acres (approx) of agricultural land at Village Golpura, District Panchkula (jointly owned by self/spouse/HUF), 300 Sq Yards Plot in Sushant Lok-1, Gurugram. (jointly owned by self/spouse/HUF), a Ground floor and basement in 285 Sq Yards house in G.K.-I, New Delhi, (jointly owned by self/spouse).

He also declared a 192 sq yards house in Sector 18-C, Chandigarh (jointly owned by self/spouse), 250 sq yards house in DLF-II, Gurugram (self). He has also 1/3rd share in the agricultural land measuring about 12 acres and a house at village Petwar, Dist Hisar, besides 1/3rd Share in 250 sq yards house, Urban Estate-II, Hisar, (inherited from father).

Justice A S Oka, who is to retire on May 24, has among his assets Rs 92.35 lakh in PPF, Rs 21.76 lakh in FD, a 2022 model Maruti Baleno car and a car loan of Rs 5.1 lakh.

Justice Vikram Nath has declared a 2-BHK apartment in Noida, a bungalow in Allahabad and inherited agricultural land in Uttar Pradesh. He also has Rs 1.5 crore in investments.

Among others, Justice K V Viswanathan looked richest for having made investments of Rs 120 Crores and has paid tax of Rs 91 Crores in the last 10 years.

Justice Viswanathan, who was directly elevated to the Supreme Court, has a builder floor house, purchased in 2010, in Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi. He has also a builder floor house purchased in 2014 in Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi.

He had a joint ownership (50% share with spouse) of a builder floor house, purchased in 2016, in Gulmohar Park, New Delhi.

As many as 12 judges, who have yet not declared their assets are: Justices B V Nagarathna, J K Maheshwari, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Prashant Kumar Mishra, Satish Chandra Sharma, Prasanna B Varale, N Kotiswar Singh, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi.

[Read Press Release]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email