The Supreme Court today i.e., November 14, 2018, is examining the sensitive pricing details of the 36 Rafale fighter jets, submitted by the Centre in a sealed cover on November 12, 2018.
A Bench comprising of
Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and
Justices S. K. Kaul and
K. M. Joseph is hearing a batch of petitions seeking a court-monitored investigation into the deal. The Central government has told the Supreme Court that Dassault Aviation, the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) in the
Rafale deal, is yet to submit a formal proposal providing the details of the Indian Offset Partner.
Further, the Central government has also stated that it has no role in the selection of Reliance Defence as Offset Partner in the Rafale deal and that the process laid down in the Defence Procurement Procedure was completely followed for the procurement of 36 Rafale Aircraft. Here are the live updates from the Supreme Court:
- CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S. K. Kaul and K. M. Joseph commences hearing at 10:40 am.
- Petitioner M.L. Sharma, argues that the 14-page document titled "Details of the steps in the decision making process leading to the award of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft order" submitted by the Centre itself reveals there has been a serious fraud.
- AAP leader Sanjay Singh's counsel now making his submissions - Centre has not disclosed price to the court but they have disclosed price in Parliament twice, submits Mr. Singh's counsel.
- A new deal was announced in 2015 without cancelling the earlier deal of 126 aircraft, Sanjay Singh.
- Prashant Bhushan making his submissions now - Three issues have been flagged - Procedure, Offset and Pricing; there are three conditions for going for an Intergovernmental Agreement which are not satisfied.
- Bhushan on pricing of the Rafale deal has argued that there can’t be any secrecy when the government itself has disclosed the price in Parliament. "It’s a bogus argument for the government to say they can’t disclose the pricing details. In the new deal, Rafale jets have cost 40% more than the earlier deal," Bhushan said in the court, as per ANI.
- Arun Shourie making his submissions now - The offset clause was slipped in. A company of the experience of Dassault which was set up in 1929 would not have chosen a company here with no experience at all, says Arun Shourie.
Further, Arun Shourie quoting a statement of
Mr. Manohar Parrikar, submits that Parrikar was unaware of this deal.
Central Government notifies Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021
Executive
Apr 10, 2021
Shreyas Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
2 Shares
The Central Government has recently notified the ‘Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021’ which amend the ‘Copyright Rules, 2013’.The key goal of the new Copyright Rules is to ensure seamless and error-free enforcement given technical advancements in the modern age. The new rules would aid India's transition to electronic media as the primary form of communication.The Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021 contain a new clause that removes the need for publishing in the Official Gazette. The...
Touchdown of Rafale Combat Aircrafts Mark the Beginning Of A New Era In Indian Military History: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh
Executive
Jul 30, 2020
Ghazal Bhootra
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
4 Shares
Rafale makes history as the first imported fighter jet to be introduced in the army since the late 90s when Sukhoi-30s were imported from Russia.46 months after the deal of €7.87 billion was made, five Rafale fighter jets made it to the Ambala airbase on the afternoon of July 29, 2020. This event took place with the attendance of the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief Air Chief Marshal (ACM) R.K.S. Bhadauria. “The touchdown of Rafale combat aircraft in India marks the beginning of a new era...
![After AG KK Venugopal, Centre files Contempt Petition against Prashant Bhushan [Read Petition]](https://lawstreet.co/secure/uploads/2019/08/lj_3237_After-AG-KK-Venugopal-Centre-files-Contempt-Petition-against-Prashant-Bhushan.jpg)
Facebook Comments