38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Rafale Deal Documents Stolen From Defence Ministry: Centre To SC

By LawStreet News Network      06 March, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Rafale Deal Documents Stolen From Defence Ministry: Centre To SC

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the Centre told the Supreme Court today (March 6, 2019) that the documents related to Rafale aircraft deal have been stolen from the Defence Ministry.

A three-judge Bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph in an open court was hearing review petitions filed by former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha and lawyer Prashant Bhushan. The petitioners seeking a review of apex court verdict in the Rafale case passed on December 14, 2018, relied upon those documents.

The petitioners asserted that the Centre quite clearly misled the court as the court had relied upon false averments to come to the conclusion that the procedure for procurement of the 36 Rafale jets was duly complied with.

When Mr. Bhushan referred to an article published in The Hindu, AG Venugopal opposed it, saying that the articles were based on stolen documents and an investigation into the matter is on.

Mr. Venugopal said that the article published on February 8, 2019, was aimed at influencing the proceedings and that amounted to contempt of court.

While Mr. Venugopal was seeking dismissal of the review petitions and raising objections to Bhushans arguments based on the articles published in The Hindu, the Bench sought to know from the Centre as to what has it done since the article was first published.

To which, the AG apprised the court that an investigation into the matter was underway.

The AG also submitted before the court that the documents on the deal relied on by the petitioners were marked secret and classified, and therefore, are in violation of Official Secrets Act, 1923.

Mr. Bhushan argued in the court that critical facts on Rafale were suppressed when the petition for an FIR and investigation were filed.

He said that the top court would not have dismissed the plea for FIR and probe into Rafale deal had there not been suppression of facts.

At this point, the CJI said that hearing Mr. Bhushan did not mean that the top court was also taking on record the documents on the Rafale deal.

The Bench rose for the lunch break asking Mr. Venugopal to apprise it about the whole development related to the stealing of the documents and the investigation conducted by the Centre in the post-lunch session.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-allows-judicial-officers-with-7-years-experience-as-advocates-to-apply-for-district-judges
Trending Legal Insiders
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years’ Bar experience to apply for district judge posts; ruling ensures level playing field and directs states to frame eligibility rules.

09 October, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-conviction-death-sentence-awarded-to-man-in-sexual-assault-murder-of-7-yr-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside conviction, death sentence awarded to man in sexual assault, murder of 7-yr-old girl [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row in 2017 Tamil Nadu case, citing prosecution’s failure and unfair trial; says courts can’t convict on moral grounds alone.

09 October, 2025 12:39 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email