38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Rajasthan HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Former Union Minister Arun Shourie in Udaipur Hotel Case.

By ROCKY DAS      25 September, 2020 05:13 PM      1 Comments
Rajasthan HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Former Union Minister Arun Shourie in Udaipur Hotel Case.

Hotel Laxmi Vilas Palace sited in Udaipur district was under the possession of the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) but was later on divested fraudulently by the NDA government in 2004. The property was valued Rs. 151 crores were divested for a mere Rs. 7.52 crore to Bharat Hotels Limited by the NDA Government in a fraudulent manner. 

The court had ordered that the property should be reverted back to the Union Government and should come under the ITDC again. The district administration of Udaipur has appointed a receiver and inform the government about the latest development. The Udaipur district administration has taken over the control of the Hotel Laxmi Vilas Palace and also started procedures for taking over the charge of the property.

During Late Atal Vihari Bajpayees led NDA regime, several hotels were sold to the private buyers under the possession of ITDC. With the Inter-Ministerial Panel, it was considered that several hotels were not valued properly and were sold fraudulently which caused a huge amount of monetary loss to the government during that time. This laid to a question mark on the duties and responsibilities upon Arun Shourie who was in charge of the disinvestment ministry back then. 

CBI has registered an FIR against the divestment Secretary Pradip Bijal who was in-charge back then and several others on the ground of causing huge monetary loss to the government by involving in the selling process of many properties which were disinvested in a fraudulent manner. In its FIR the CBI stated that in 2001-02 the heritage hotel which was first under the possession of ITDC sold undervalued to the Bharat Hotels Limited. While the above-said property was valued Rs 150 crore by the government norm, the market value of such property was Rs 280 crore. 

While the CBI has registered an FIR in 2014, immediately gave a closure report of the complaint after following a formal inquiry. The CBI court had ordered to reinitiate the inquiry process, CBI again filed a closure report stated that the inquiry cannot be pursued further due to lack of evidence and absence of witnesses whereas the CBI court has not fully convinced by the closure report submitted by the CBI.

The Special Judge of the CBI court, Pooran Kumar Sharma issued summon through arrest warrants to then Union Minister of State for Disinvestment Arun Shourie, then Disinvestment Secretary Pradip Baijal, MD of Lazard India Private Limited Ashish Kumar Guha, KantilalKaramseyVikramsey, Proprietor of KantiKaramsey&Co Directors of Bharat Hotels Jyotsna Suri and other government officials and private persons under the section 120B (Criminal Conspiracy) and 420 (Cheating) of Indian Penal Code and section 13 (1) D of Prevention of Corruption Act.

The Senior Counsel Prashant Bhushan and Advocate Pradeep Shah, on behalf of Arun Shourie made a petition suggesting that imposing of the Prevention of Corruption Act imposed by the lower Trial Court was not necessary and also mentioned that in the case of Pradip Baijal Vs Union of India, the petitioner name was not mentioned in the FIR registered, the petitioner should get some exemption from appearing for the trials in the court. Arun Shourie age 79, being a senior citizen who was suffering from various age-related issues and his wifes ailments and having a child who requires his care cannot be able to appear before the court particularly in the current situation, the counsel further argued.

Considering the arguments by the Counsel, the Rajasthan High Court ordered and granted interim protection to the petitioner Arun Shourie from arrest on 23rd September 2020.



Share this article:



John Doe
meadowon7@gmail.com Oct 16, 2020

It is a great blog post.I am always read your blog helpful and informative tips. I like it thanks for sharing this information with us

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email