38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion, and without the same it becomes lifeless, says Gujarat High Court.

By LawStreet News Network      02 March, 2022 03:16 AM      0 Comments
Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion Gujarat High Court

The statement was made by the Bench of Justice Ashok Kumar Joshi, in pursuance of a writ petition challenging the judgement of the Appellate Court. The appellate Court had allowed the condonation of 2 years and 5 months of the party in filing the execution petition, against the judgement of the Civil Judge, and upon improper merit.

The Court said, “Reasoned order furthers the cause of justice as well as avoids uncertainty it helps in the observance of law of precedent. Lack of reasons introduces an element of uncertainty, dissatisfaction and give entirely different dimensions to the questions of law raised before the higher/appellate courts. The Court should provide its own grounds and reasons for rejecting claim/prayer of a party whether at the very threshold i.e. at the admission stage or after regular hearing, howsoever precise they may be...The aforesaid should be weighed with by all the Presiding Officers while dealing with a case”

Case background:

In a suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction a compromise was made between the parties. There was a delay of about 2 years and 5 months from the respondent’s (original applicant), in filing the execution petition. They therefore filed condonation of delay, which was upheld by the first appellate court.

The Petitioners stated that there was substantial error on the Respondents end for delaying the execution petition by 15 years and the condonation should not have been permitted, whereas the Respondent stated that the Court condoned the delay only upon comprehending the essential facts Further, when the compromise decree was passed, the Respondent had died and his heirs did not know about the decree. The wife of the Respondent also did not know the legal nitty gritty and could not file the execution petition in time.


Justice Ashok Kumar Joshi referref to the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Subrata Borah Chowlek and Ors. [MANU/SC/1252/2010] to comprehend the issue pertaining to the condonation of delay.

“It is trite that in a delay application, sufficient cause is the paramount consideration and if sufficient cause is shown, then Court should generally condone the delay. However, if the sufficient cause is imbibed with the laxity on the part of the delayer despite due knowledge, then Court should restrain itself from encouraging such practice and condone the delay.”

As admitted, that upon the death of the respondent, the wife of the respondent was unaware about the nitty gritty of law, the Court observed that ignorantia juris non excusat.

What is ignorantia juris non excusat? 

Ignorantia juris non excusat is the Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no one" respectively”. It is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content.

“Nonetheless, it is also trite that every case should be decided on merits rather than mere technicalities, save and except they are inexcusable. Accordingly, in the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the learned first appellate Court has rightly exercised the discretion with a view to advance the substantial justice”

Finally the High Court did agree to the order of the first appellate Court lacking substantial reasoning to it. The Bench held that even though the submissions of parties to the First appellate court were detailed, when entertained in appeal, the findings of the Appellate Court were bereft any reasoning and was simply made upon reference from the earlier petitions.

The bench cited the case of State of Rajasthan v. Rajendra Prasad Jain [Criminal Appeal No. 360/2008].

“Providing of reasons in orders is of essence in judicial proceedings. Every litigant who approaches the Court with a prayer is entitled to know the reasons for acceptance or rejection of such request. Either of the parties to the list has a right of appeal and, therefore, it is essential for them to know the considered opinion of the Court to make the remedy of appeal meaningful."

Therefore, the Bench held that “at least brief reasoning must be provided in judicial orders to secure the ends of justice, even in cases where judicial discretion is exercised”. 

However, after analysing the record, the High Court found itself in agreement with the impugned judgement and dismissed the petition.

Even though the plea got dismissed and the High Court found itself in coherence with the impugned order, the submissions made by the High Court regarding “Speaking Reasoned Orders” came as a remarkable guideline for further adjudications.


Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Gravity of offence not relevant when considering bail for juvenile [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants bail to a juvenile in a serious criminal case, ruling that the gravity of the offence is not a relevant factor in bail decisions.

22 June, 2024 11:18 AM
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email