People not wearing masks in public spaces are violating the fundamental right to life of everyone else, the Apex Court said on Thursday (December 3, 2020) as it implored all states to enforce the guidelines on wearing masks & social distancing scrupulously in the face of the Coronavirus pandemic.
At the same time, the Supreme Court stayed a Gujarat HC order that sought to punish those not wearing masks in public by assigning them to COVID-19 centres to perform non-medical duties, terming the punishment "disproportionate”. A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan regretted that people have been recently showing a lack of will to follow the guidelines meant to prevent the spread of the virus, & the authorities were apathetic in implementing the norms on masks & social distancing. "They may hamper health of other people,” remarked the bench, which also included Justice RS Reddy & Justice MR Shah.
The Bench told Mehta that "There is a lack of will everywhere".Mehta accepted that it was a pan-India problem and that certain urgent measures, including the imposition of a higher fine on violators, can be ordered by the Supreme Court. At this, the bench reiterated that enhancing the fine may not suffice until there is proper implementation. Mehta, on behalf of the Government of Gujarat, had sought a stay of the high court order to send those not wearing masks in public to perform non-medical duties in Coronavirus centres as punishment.
The bench concurred with the solicitor general that such punishment may pose serious health risks even to non-Covid-19 persons and stayed this part of the order. It further asked all State Governments to submit suggestions by Monday, 07 December, 2020 on how to control public gatherings & ensure compliance with the requirement of wearing masks & maintaining social distancing. The bench said it will consider issuing directions for all states after the responses are received.
J & K High Court Orders Testing of all Lawyers after Senior Advocate Tests COVID-19 Positive
Legal Insiders
Mar 04, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
3 Shares
At the Srinagar wing of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court one of the senior advocates tested positive for COVID-19. After this, all the lawyers practicing in the High Court have been asked to undergo the COVID-19 test in order to ensure collective safety. An order was issued by the Registrar Judicial, Srinagar which stated: “It has come to the knowledge of the undersigned that one of the senior advocates has tested COVID-19 positive, as such, in order to prevent the spread of the...
Supreme Court Asks Centre to Consider Giving a Break to Doctors Engaged During the Pandemic
Judiciary
Dec 17, 2020
Dev Kumar Patel
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
2 Shares
The Supreme Court asked the Centre on 15th December 2020 to consider granting a break to doctors engaged in duty for the last seven-eight months during COVID-19 pandemic.While Top Court expressing its concern towards doctor the bench told Mr. Mehta that "for the last seven-eight months doctors have not been given any break and are continuously working. You take instruction and think over giving them some break. It must be very painful and might be affecting their mental health".A bench of...
Facebook Comments