38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 19, 2024

SC Says Routine Explanations Are Not Enough, Reasonable Explanation Is Necessary For Condonation Of Delay [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      25 December, 2019 12:12 PM      0 Comments
SC Says Routine Explanations Are Not Enough, Reasonable Explanation Is Necessary For Condonation Of Delay [Read Judgment]

In an appeal filed by University of Delhi against the order of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court which dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) on the ground of delay of 916 days, a full bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justice R. Banumathi, Justice AS Bopanna and Justice Hrishikesh Roy opined that a liberal approach is to be taken in the matter of condonation of delay.

The bench also added that condonation of long delay must not be automatic as the resulting right or the unfavourable consequence to the opposite party is also to be kept in mind. Hence, the bench observed that,

The consideration for condonation of delay would not depend on the status of the party namely the Government or the public bodies so as to apply a different yardstick but the ultimate consideration should be to render even-handed justice to the parties. Even in such case the condonation of long delay should not be automatic since the accrued right or the adverse consequence to the opposite party is also to be   kept   in  perspective. In that background while considering condonation of delay, the routine explanation would not be enough but it should be in the nature of indicating “sufficient cause” to justify the delay which will depend on the backdrop of each case and will have to be weighed carefully by the Courts based on the fact situation.”

The Apex Court further stated that, “The delay in the instant facts in filing the LPA is 916 days and as such the consideration to condone can be made only if there is reasonable explanation and the condonation cannot be merely because the appellant is a public body.”

In the instant case, the explanation for the inordinate delay of 916 days was due to:

a. The non-availability of the Vice Chancellor due to retirement and subsequent appointment of new Vice Chancellor and;

b. The matter was placed before the Executive council and a decision was taken to file the appeal and the said process had caused the delay. 

The bench did not find the above reasons justified enough and stated that instead of routine explanation, a reasonable and acceptable explanation is very much necessary.


[Read Judgment]

Author: Swetalana Rout

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM


Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email