38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Rules Of BCI And Govt. Regarding Approvals To Law Colleges Have To Be Harmoniously Interpreted: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      20 August, 2019 04:08 PM      0 Comments
Rules Of BCI And Govt. Regarding Approvals To Law Colleges Have To Be Harmoniously Interpreted: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court on August 13, 2019, in the case of Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law & Anr. v. Directorate of Higher Education & Ors., has held that the Rules of Bar Council of India regarding approval of Colleges and the Rules/Policy laid down by the Directorate of Higher Education have to be read in harmony. Moreover, the temporary approval granted by the BCI cannot be used to challenge the non-grant of NOC by the Directorate of Higher Education (DoHE) when the conditions laid down in the temporary approval have not been complied with.

In this case, a writ petition was filed by the Petitioner College against the non-grant of NOC by the DoHE for the academic year 2019-20. The Petitioner had asked for a NOC in order to continue running its BBA LL.B. course with an intake of 180 students.

The Petitioner submitted that it had received permission from both the Bar Council of India and the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) for running a BBA LL.B. course with an intake of 180 students for the academic year 2019-2020. It was also argued that the action of the DoHE is unreasonable because it had given the NOC for the same course in the academic year 2011-12 and the current refusal goes against the permission already granted by the BCI.

The Petitioner also submitted that it is settled law that in the case of a possible conflict between the rules and regulations for granting approval, prescribed by the apex body of the statutory body governing the said discipline, and rules and regulations as stipulated by the State government, the rules and regulations for granting approval prescribed by the apex of the statutory body must prevail.

It was further argued that the provisions of the Central Statute and a State Statute are inconsistent and repugnant to each other, the Central Statute has to prevail over the State Statute and denial of affiliation by the State University on the grounds that are inconsistent with those enumerated in the Central Statute have to be inoperative. Therefore, DoHE is precluded from imposing any condition for grant of NOC to the petitioner college which is inconsistent with the provisions made under the Advocates Act, 1961 read with the Rules of Legal Education 2008.

On the other hand, DoHE, submitted that the petitioner college is not entitled to an intake of 180 students in the BBA LL.B. course as sought by it, for the reason that it does not satisfy the minimum space requirements as stipulated in the applicable policy guidelines issued by them.

It argued that BCI only assesses and lays down the minimum space requirement and the prescription by the respondent No. 1 will be binding, with regard to the minimum requirement of space. This point regarding prescription of space requirement and the paucity of space in the Petitioner College to accommodate 60 more students was also agreed upon by the BCI and GGSIPU.

The court refused the claim of the Petitioner College by noting that the BCI's approval was temporary and was contingent on a condition that has not been fulfilled by the College. It observed that rules of the BCI itself stipulate that the space requirements have to be in accordance with the regulations as guided by the respective authority of the University under the regulations guided by the UGC and the Rules of 2008 of the BCI, which in the present case, are not complied with.

The court also refused to side with the cases cited by the Petitioner by opining that the same were wholly misplaced in the facts and circumstances of the instant case inasmuch as the Bar Council of India Rules of Legal Education Part IV and the Policy Guidelines of the DoHE have to be read in harmony and are not in conflict with each other.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-comes-down-heavily-on-use-of-offensive-language-in-social-media
Trending Judiciary
SC comes down heavily on use of offensive language in social media

SC slams use of abusive language on social media; warns petitioner over objectionable posts on PM Modi, RSS, says state free to act if conduct continues.

16 July, 2025 03:30 PM
sc-declines-plea-for-premature-release-of-convict-in-triple-murder-linked-to-terror-act
Trending Judiciary
SC declines plea for premature release of convict in triple murder linked to terror act

SC refuses premature release of triple murder convict linked to terror; allows challenge to J&K remission policy in pending case.

16 July, 2025 03:35 PM

TOP STORIES

s-31-of-dv-act-not-to-apply-for-breach-of-maintenance-order-ktka-hc
Trending Judiciary
S 31 of DV Act not to apply for breach of maintenance order: Ktka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka HC rules Sec 31 of DV Act applies only to protection orders, not maintenance breaches under Sec 20; sets aside woman’s plea against husband.

12 July, 2025 06:06 PM
plea-in-sc-seeks-stay-on-order-to-display-qr-code-for-eatery-owners-on-kanwar-yatra-route
Trending Judiciary
Plea in SC seeks stay on order to display QR code for eatery owners on Kanwar Yatra route

Plea in SC seeks stay on UP-Uttarakhand order mandating QR codes to reveal eatery owners’ identity along Kanwar Yatra route, citing privacy violation.

12 July, 2025 06:15 PM
on-scs-rebuke-cartoonist-agrees-to-delete-objectionable-posts-on-pm-rss
Trending Judiciary
On SC's rebuke, Cartoonist agrees to delete objectionable posts on PM, RSS

SC slams cartoonist Hemant Malviya for objectionable post on PM Modi, RSS; he agrees to delete it after court questions his inflammatory conduct.

14 July, 2025 04:06 PM
trying-best-but-nothing-much-can-be-done-centre-to-sc-on-kerala-nurses-execution
Trending Judiciary
Trying best but nothing much can be done, Centre to SC on Kerala nurse's execution

Centre tells SC it tried through private channels to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya from Yemen execution, but says “nothing much can be done”.

14 July, 2025 04:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email