38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Judiciary

'Same-sex marriage judgment treats homosexuals as sub-par humans,' plea filed in SC for review

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      02 November, 2023 03:33 PM      0 Comments
Same sex marriage judgment treats homosexuals as sub-par humans plea filed in SC for review

NEW DELHI: A review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court against October 17 judgement by a five-judge Constitution bench declining to grant legal recognition to the marriage of same-sex couples, saying it overlooked that the legislative choice treated homosexuals as sub-par humans.

The plea filed by Udit Sood, one of the petitioners, contended that the judgment suffered from errors apparent on the face of the record and was self-contradictory and manifestly unjust on in its understanding of "marriage".

"The majority judgment effectively compels young queer Indians to remain in the closet and lead dishonest lives if they wish the joys of a real family. It is fallacious that, under these facts, and in the absence of a fundamental right to marry or form a union, the rights to equal protection, dignity and fraternity are insufficient to justify judicial intervention," the plea said.

It also said the judgement acknowledged that the Special Marriage Act, 1954 conferred the "status" of marriage, observing that the Act "in fact created social status or facilitated the status of individuals in private fields" and that the Parliament "has intervened and facilitated creation of social status (marriage) through SMA."

However, the ruling then rests on the opposite premise-namely, that the terms of marriage are largely set independently of the state and that the status of marriage "is still not one that is conferred by the state", the plea said.

"The majority judgment overlooks that marriage, at its core, is an enforceable social contract. The right to so contract is available to anyone capable of consenting. Adults of any faith-or no faith-may engage in it. No one group of people may define for another what "marriage" means. No contract, nor forceful State action like imprisonment, may curtail an adult's fundamental right to marry," it said.

The petitioner further said the majority judgment warranted review because it summarily disregards the foregoing authority to make the chilling declaration that the Constitution guarantees no fundamental right to marry, found a family, or form a civil union.

"The majority judgment is manifestly unjust because it countenances animus-motivated depravation of the petitioners' fundamental rights. And yet, it overlooks that the legislative choice herein treats homosexuals as sub-par humans" the plea said.

In its decision, the top court had declined to grant legal recognition to the marriage of same-sex couples. However, it did uphold their right to cohabitation without any threat to violence and interference and also sought to debunk the notion that homosexuality was an urban, elite concept.

The judges were divided on the issue of civil unions (akin to marriage) and adoption by same-sex couples, and in a 3:2 judgement ruled against both, while noting that marriage laws can't be seen in isolation.

The plea said the majority judgment neuters this Court's jurisdiction, holding that while "recognition" of discrimination and violation of the petitioners' fundamental rights "is this court's obligation, falling within its remit" (Ref opinion of Justice S Ravindra Bhat), separation of powers prohibits this Court from enjoining the discrimination or otherwise protecting those fundamental rights.

"It is submitted that this is an error apparent on the face of the record and an abdication of the duty entrusted to this Court by the Constitution of our country. Our Constitution primarily tasks this Court-not the Respondents with upholding fundamental rights.

"This court has no more important function than to preserve the inviolable fundamental rights of the people, as per Smt Ujjam Bai vs State Of UP (1963). To find that the petitioners are enduring discrimination, but then turn them away with best wishes for the future, conforms neither with this Court's Constitutional obligation towards queer Indians nor with the separation of powers contemplated in our Constitution," it added.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS

need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
call-for-chapters-gender-based-violence-and-religion
Trending Law School
Call For Chapters: Gender-Based Violence and Religion

Calling For Book Chapters: As an editor, Dr. Amit Anand, Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, REVA University, Bengaluru, is inviting people to contribute to a book, entitled "Gender-Based Violence and Religion." This book is scheduled to be published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

15 April, 2024 04:21 PM

TOP STORIES

misleading-advts-case-baba-ramdev-balkrishna-tender-apology
Trending Business
Misleading advts case: Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna tender apology

Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna apologize for misleading ads. SC contempt plea hearing set for April 10. Patanjali assures compliance with court orders.

10 April, 2024 10:44 AM
sc-allows-gangster-turned-politicians-son-to-attend-fatiha
Trending Judiciary
SC allows gangster-turned-politician's son to attend 'Fatiha'

Supreme Court allows jailed MLA Abbas Ansari to attend his father's funeral prayers, granting temporary release under police custody.

10 April, 2024 11:11 AM
each-moveable-property-not-required-to-be-disclosed-by-candidates-in-election-sc
Trending Judiciary
Each moveable property not required to be disclosed by candidates in election: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules not every movable asset needs disclosure in elections. Privacy rights preserved. Details vary per case. High value assets matter.

10 April, 2024 12:02 PM
delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-moves-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court against dismissal of plea in liquor policy scam case. Lawyers seek early hearing from CJI-led bench.

10 April, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email