38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, July 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC allows investigation against public servant in disproportionate assets case; says no right to grant hearing before lodging FIR [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      09 April, 2025 03:30 PM      0 Comments
SC allows investigation against public servant in disproportionate assets case says no right to grant hearing before lodging FIR

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has allowed investigation into disproportionate assets case involving a public servant, holding that there is no inherent right of a government officer to be heard before registration of an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K Vinod Chandra set aside High Court's April 25, 2024 order which quashed the entire criminal proceedings initiated against Channakeshava H D, in a case of disproportionate assets case.

Supreme Court Upholds FIR in Corruption Case Without Preliminary Enquiry

Allowing a plea by the Karnataka Lokayukta, the bench said, "We are of the considered opinion that the High Court ought not to have quashed the FIR in the present case".

No Prior Hearing Needed Before Filing FIR Under Prevention of Corruption Act: SC

The court also noted preliminary enquiry was not mandated in the present case, considering that detailed information was already there before the Superintendent of Police in the form of the source report.

The order passed by the SP, directing registration of FIR reflected that the SP had passed that order on the basis of material placed before him in the form of the source report, the court noted.

According to this source report, it was prima facie found that the then Executive Engineer had acquired assets disproportionate to his known sources of income during the check period i.e. November 11, 1998 to September 30, 2023, to the tune of Rs 6,64,67,000.

Based on this source report, which is nothing but a kind of preliminary enquiry, an order was passed by the SP directing the registration of an FIR against him, senior advocate Devadatt Kamat and advocate Nishanth Patil said on behalf of Lokayukta.    

Dealing with a writ petition, the High Court, however, quashed the FIR, holding that although before lodging of the FIR, orders did come from the Superintendent of Police but the SP had not conducted any preliminary enquiry before passing his orders and therefore, there was no application of mind.

The Lokayukta counsel submitted that a preliminary enquiry is desirable but not mandatory. The SP had passed an order on December 04, 2023 under Section 17 of the PC Act on consideration of relevant materials, including a source report of October 05, 2023.  

There is no provision for a preliminary enquiry under Section 13 or Section 17 of the PC Act. The second proviso to Section 17 of the PC Act does not speak of a preliminary enquiry, they said.

It was only in Lalita Kumari Vs Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors (2014) that this court had held that before proceeding against a public servant in matters of corruption, it is desirable to have a preliminary enquiry, they said.

Once a detailed source report is there before the SP, explaining the reasons for initiation of proceedings and when details are given, a formal preliminary enquiry may not be necessary as all the relevant material is already there before the SP, the counsel said.

The counsel also cited State of Karnataka Vs T N Sudhakar Reddy (2025) to contend that an enquiry before registration of FIR under PC Act is not mandatory.

The counsel also said this court has held that in matters of corruption a preliminary enquiry although desirable, but is not mandatory. In a case where a superior officer, based on a detailed source report disclosing the commission of a cognizable offence, passes an order for registration of FIR, the requirement of preliminary enquiry can be relaxed.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the then Executive Engineer, contended he was never given a chance to explain his position before the registration of FIR. He argued that FIR has been used as an instrument to harass the public servant and this is a case where no prior notice or hearing was given to the officer, which could have taken place if a preliminary enquiry had been held.

Responding to this, Kamat cited a three-judge bench decision of this court in CBI Vs Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi, (2021) where it was specifically stated that an accused public servant does not have any right to explain the alleged disproportionate assets before filing of an FIR.

"We are also of the opinion that this is the correct legal position as there is no inherent right of a public servant to be heard at this stage," the bench said, setting aside the HC's order.

The public servant, appointed as an Assistant Engineer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited in 1998, was promoted to the post of Executive Engineer in Bangalore Electricity Supply Corporation. It was alleged he had enriched himself illicitly and consequently, an FIR with Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore Town (Bangalore) was registered on December 04, 2023 under Section 13(1)(b) read with 13(2) of the PC Act.
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-acquits-man-on-death-row-issues-procedural-guidelines-on-dna-evidence
Trending Judiciary
SC acquits man on death row; issues procedural guidelines on DNA evidence [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row, cites faulty probe; issues detailed procedural guidelines for DNA evidence collection, storage, and chain of custody.

17 July, 2025 11:04 AM
sc-issues-orders-for-disabled-friendly-prisons
Trending Judiciary
SC issues orders for disabled-friendly prisons [Read Judgment]

SC directs disability-friendly prisons; says denial of basic care violates Articles 14 & 21; orders infrastructure upgrades, audits, and compliance within 6 months.

17 July, 2025 11:18 AM

TOP STORIES

s-31-of-dv-act-not-to-apply-for-breach-of-maintenance-order-ktka-hc
Trending Judiciary
S 31 of DV Act not to apply for breach of maintenance order: Ktka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka HC rules Sec 31 of DV Act applies only to protection orders, not maintenance breaches under Sec 20; sets aside woman’s plea against husband.

12 July, 2025 06:06 PM
plea-in-sc-seeks-stay-on-order-to-display-qr-code-for-eatery-owners-on-kanwar-yatra-route
Trending Judiciary
Plea in SC seeks stay on order to display QR code for eatery owners on Kanwar Yatra route

Plea in SC seeks stay on UP-Uttarakhand order mandating QR codes to reveal eatery owners’ identity along Kanwar Yatra route, citing privacy violation.

12 July, 2025 06:15 PM
on-scs-rebuke-cartoonist-agrees-to-delete-objectionable-posts-on-pm-rss
Trending Judiciary
On SC's rebuke, Cartoonist agrees to delete objectionable posts on PM, RSS

SC slams cartoonist Hemant Malviya for objectionable post on PM Modi, RSS; he agrees to delete it after court questions his inflammatory conduct.

14 July, 2025 04:06 PM
trying-best-but-nothing-much-can-be-done-centre-to-sc-on-kerala-nurses-execution
Trending Judiciary
Trying best but nothing much can be done, Centre to SC on Kerala nurse's execution

Centre tells SC it tried through private channels to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya from Yemen execution, but says “nothing much can be done”.

14 July, 2025 04:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email