38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court to Hear Appeal Against Kerala HC Judgement that Held Kerala Tax on Paper Lotteries Act Unconstitutional

By Tanya Sehrawat      11 March, 2021 10:29 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court to Hear Appeal Against Kerala HC Judgement that Held Kerala Tax on Paper Lotteries Act Unconstitutional

Special leave has been granted by the Supreme Court in the Special leave Petition that was filed by the state of Kerala against the judgement of Kerala High Court. This judgement held Kerala Tax on the Kerala Paper Lotteries Act, 2005 unconstitutional. 

The judgement was stayed to the extent to the direction with regard to the refund of the amount already deposited by the Bench which comprised Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah. 

The tax of the state of Kerala was held unconstitutional by the Kerala High Court on the ground that it lacked legislative competence to impose the same on the lotteries organised by the state, deriving its power from Entry 62 of List II of the Constitution. 

On the other hand, the main contention of the state was, the judgements that kerala High Court went on to refer (those of the Karnataka & Bombay High Court) are under challenge before the Supreme Court. Along with this, the Supreme Court judgement of Skill Loto Solutions Pvt Ltd v Union of India that had upheld the levy of Goods & Services tax (GST) on lotteries, betting and gambling was also relied on by the state. 

While granting the relief the bench had that there shall be an interim order by which the judgement of the High Court to the extent of the direction with regard to refund of the amount already deposited shall remain stayed. 

The Division Bench of the High Court lastly observed:

The activity of conduct of the lottery or the measure upon which tax is sought to be levied, cannot be said to have any direct nexus with the sale of tickets taking place within the State of Kerala. Hence the contention that the Act is intended to introduce an indirect taxation on the sale of lottery tickets, the same is prohibited under law. If it is something prohibited under law, the same cannot be done through an indirect method. If it is tax on other activity of organising and conducting of the lottery, then it becomes extra territorial. Hence, considering the provisions of the charging section and also considering the territorial application and further considering the law remaining settled prohibiting taxation on the sale of lottery tickets we are inclined to sustain the challenge made against the impugned legislature on the points urged as above.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email