38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 03, 2023
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us

SC asks Centre to examine on less painful method of execution than hanging

By Lawstreet News Network      Mar 21, 2023      0 Comments      272 Views
SC asks Centre to examine on less painful method of execution than hanging

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre to start a discussion and collect necessary information to examine if there can be a less painful method than hanging by neck to execute death penalty in the country.

The top court also indicated that it is open to set up a panel of experts, from National Law Universities and AIIMS too.

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha allowed Attorney General R Venkataramani time till May to ascertain if any study has been conducted to find more humane method of execution and impact of death penalty by hanging.

"We can look at the matter from the point of view of technology and science if today's stage of knowledge says hanging is the best way," the bench said.

"Do we have any data either in India or overseas regarding alternate methods. Or do we form a committee? We're just thinking. We can have National Law Universities on the committee. The National Law University, Delhi has some eminent people," the bench added.

The court was hearing a writ petition by advocate Rishi Malhotra seeking a direction for quashing of the provision contained under Section 354(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code as ultra vires the Constitution and especially Article 21 being discriminatory and also in contravention of the Constitution Bench Judgment in Gian Kaur's case (1962).

The judgement had then said, "the Right to Life including the Right to Live with human dignity would mean the existence of such a right upto the end of natural life. This also includes the right to a dignified life upto the point of death including a dignified procedure of death. In other words, this may include the right of a dying man to also die with dignity when his life is ebbing out."

The petitioner also contended there is a discrimination vis-à-vis a condemned prisoner who has been tried under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the prisoner who has been tried under the provision of the Air Force Act, 1950, the Army Act, 1950 and the Navy Act, 1957.  

"Under Section 354(5) CrPC, the only mode which has been prescribed for execution of the death sentence is hanging by neck till death whereas under the mentioned acts, the execution has to be carried out either by hanging by neck till death or by being shot to death," his plea stated.

On October 6, 2017, the top court had issued notice to the Centre in the matter, noting the contention of the petitioner that the convict whose life has to end because of the conviction and the sentence should not be compelled to suffer the pain of hanging.

The petitioner has also referred to the 187th report of the Law Commission.

"Though we do not intend to advert to the same at present, yet it may be observed, prima facie, that legislature can think of some other mode by which a convict who, in law, has to face the death sentence should die without pain. It has been said for centuries that nothing can be equated with painless death. And that is, possibly, the dignity in death," the court had said.

Supreme CourtExamineHangingDeathPenaltyExecutionCJIDYChandrachudNational Law UniversitiesAIIMSJustice P S NarasimhaAttorney General R VenkataramaniAdvocate Rishi MalhotraSection 354(5) Criminal Procedure CodeConstitutionArticle 21Right to LifeCode of Criminal Procedure 1973Air Force Act 1950Army Act 1950Navy Act 1957Section 354(5)CrPC
Share this article:

Lawstreet News Network

Leave a feedback about this

Related Posts
View All




Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email