38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, October 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC asks EC to file response to plea seeking reasons for excluding 65 lakh voters in Bihar's SIR

By Jhanak Sharma      06 August, 2025 03:16 PM      0 Comments
SC asks EC to file response to plea seeking reasons for excluding 65 lakh voters in Bihars SIR

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Election Commission to a plea claiming 65 lakh voters in Bihar have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision of the electoral rolls, without disclosing the reasons.

The top court also asked the Election Commission to provide details of those 65 lakh voters.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh asked the Election Commission's counsel to furnish by August 9, the details of deleted voters, already shared with the political parties, and give a copy to the NGO, Association For Democratic Reforms.

The NGO, which has filed a plea challenging validity of the June 24 order of the EC for Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, moved fresh application seeking direction to the poll panel to publish the names of around 65 lakh deleted voters with the mention whether they are dead, permanently migrated or not considered for any other reason.

The plea was mentioned before the court urgent consideration.

The bench told advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, that the reason for deletion would come in subsequent time as it is now only a draft list.

However, Bhushan contended that some political parties have been given a list of deleted voters but they have not further clarified whether the said voter is dead or migrated.

The EC's counsel that they would place on record that it had shared the information with the political parties representatives.

"We will see every voter likely to be affected and get the required information. You (EC) file a reply by Saturday and let Bhushan look at it and then we can see what is disclosed and what is not disclosed," the bench told the EC counsel.

Bhushan claimed that 75 per cent of voters, who have filled the enumeration form have not furnished any supporting documents mentioned in the list of 11 documents and their names were included on the recommendation of Booth Level Officer (BLO) of the poll panel.

The court said it would hear the batch of petitions challenging the June 24 order of the poll panel on August 12 and the NGO can make its submission on that day.

On July 29, the Supreme Court said it was monitoring the process of Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar as a judicial authority, and it would immediately step in if there was mass exclusion of voters.

The court sought to allay the apprehension of petitioners, who contended as many as 65 lakh voters have been excluded on the ground that either they are dead or have permanently shifted their place of residence.

Fixing the date of hearing on August 12 and 13 on the batch of petitions, the court then said, it would first hear them on their apprehension of the draft list, published on August 1.

On July 28, 2025, the Supreme Court said, instead of en masse exclusion of voters, en masse inclusion should be the goal of the Election Commission as it again suggested the poll panel to include Aadhaar and Voter ID cards as valid documents in the Special intensive Revision of electoral rolls being undertaken in Bihar.

The top court, however, refused to restrain the Election Commission from publishing draft voters list on August 1, 2025.

The court had also clarified that the court can strike down the entire process if any illegality was found. 

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-singer-neha-rathores-plea-to-quash-fir-wrt-her-social-media-posts
Trending CelebStreet
SC rejects singer Neha Rathore's plea to quash FIR wrt her social media posts

SC refuses to quash FIR against singer Neha Singh Rathore over her social media post on Pahalgam terror attack; allows case to proceed under BNS provisions.

14 October, 2025 10:57 AM
madhya-pradesh-hc-dismisses-appeal-seeking-reconstruction-of-demolished-masjid-in-ujjain
Trending Judiciary
Madhya Pradesh HC Dismisses Appeal Seeking Reconstruction Of Demolished Masjid In Ujjain [Read Order]

MP High Court dismisses plea to reconstruct Ujjain’s Takiya Masjid, ruling that right to practice religion isn’t tied to any specific place.

14 October, 2025 11:15 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-allows-judicial-officers-with-7-years-experience-as-advocates-to-apply-for-district-judges
Trending Legal Insiders
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years’ Bar experience to apply for district judge posts; ruling ensures level playing field and directs states to frame eligibility rules.

09 October, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-conviction-death-sentence-awarded-to-man-in-sexual-assault-murder-of-7-yr-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside conviction, death sentence awarded to man in sexual assault, murder of 7-yr-old girl [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row in 2017 Tamil Nadu case, citing prosecution’s failure and unfair trial; says courts can’t convict on moral grounds alone.

09 October, 2025 12:39 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-bail-for-forged-court-summons-cites-threat-to-public-trust-in-judiciary
Trending Judiciary
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Bail For Forged Court Summons, Cites Threat To Public Trust In Judiciary [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC denies anticipatory bail to woman accused of forging court summons, saying such acts erode public trust in the justice system.

09 October, 2025 12:53 PM
father-cannot-seek-refund-of-maintenance-paid-after-children-turn-18-himachal-hc
Trending Judiciary
Father Cannot Seek Refund of Maintenance Paid After Children Turn 18: Himachal HC [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that a father can’t seek refund of maintenance paid after children turn 18, citing moral duty beyond legal obligation.

09 October, 2025 01:47 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email