38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 30, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC asks why anti pollution measures, firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

By Jhanak Sharma      13 September, 2025 10:43 AM      0 Comments
SC asks why anti pollution measures firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday asked why anti-pollution measures like the crackers ban were limited to Delhi alone, emphasising the need for clean air for every citizen across the country.

A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran said that if the cities of NCR (National Capital Region) have the right to clean air, then why don’t the people of other cities?

The bench observed that just because it is the capital city and the apex court is situated in this area, “we should have pollution-free air, but not the other citizens in the country?”

The court was informed by a counsel that citizens of Delhi literally choked due to pollution, and in winters, it was impossible to breathe. It was emphasised that pollution is a national problem.

Amicus Curiae Senior Advocate K Parameshwar said that a ban on firecrackers for the period from October to February would have been justified, but a complete ban on its manufacturing, trading and selling would affect the livelihood of many.

The CJI, on his part, recalled that last winter, he was in Amritsar on Guruparb day, and he was told that the pollution in Amritsar was higher than in Delhi.

He emphasised, if a policy were to be made, then it has to be made on a pan-India basis.

Also Watch

“We cannot have special treatment for Delhi because people in Delhi are elite,” the CJI said.

Senior advocate Aparajita Singh, the amicus curiae in the case, submitted that the elite class takes care of itself, and whenever there is pollution, they move out of Delhi. She said the elites have air purifiers, but the people on the streets do not have a choice.

"Therefore, we should have a policy for the entire country, and a separate policy should not be there for only the national capital, and if firecrackers are banned, then let them be banned throughout the country," the bench said.

The court also noted there are also poor who depend on the industry.

The bench asked a ban is put on construction, but what about the workers during that period.

The court was informed that the state has disbursed crores of rupees to the construction workers from the fund allocated for them, and the court has already taken care of that aspect.

The court sought a report from the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) in the matter.

Additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati informed the bench that it will be in consultation with the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), as it has been working on green crackers.

The court said that NEERI's views should be considered before the report is submitted and fixed the matter for consideration after two weeks.

The court fixed the matter for consideration on September 22.

The apex court was considering a plea against the order that banned the sale, storage, transportation and manufacture of firecrackers in the Delhi-NCR region.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

TOP STORIES

bhagavad-gita-not-a-religious-text-fcra-registration-cannot-be-denied-for-teaching-gita-and-yoga-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Bhagavad Gita Not a Religious Text; FCRA Registration Cannot Be Denied for Teaching Gita and Yoga: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules Bhagavad Gita is not a religious text; FCRA registration cannot be denied to organisations teaching Gita and Yoga.

24 December, 2025 05:35 PM
two-distinct-reliefs-cannot-be-intermingled-in-a-single-writ-petition-sc
Trending Judiciary
Two Distinct Reliefs Cannot Be Intermingled in a Single Writ Petition: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that distinct reliefs cannot be combined in one writ petition, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh plea limited to one relief.

24 December, 2025 05:45 PM
income-from-sale-of-tissue-cultured-plants-constitutes-agricultural-income-exempt-from-tax-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income from Sale of Tissue-Cultured Plants Constitutes Agricultural Income, Exempt from Tax: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules income from sale of tissue-cultured plants is agricultural income exempt from tax under the Income Tax Act.

24 December, 2025 06:05 PM
sc-steps-in-to-address-systematic-forest-land-grabbing-in-uttarakhand
Trending Judiciary
SC Steps In to Address Systematic Forest Land Grabbing in Uttarakhand [Read Order]

Supreme Court flags systematic forest land grabbing in Uttarakhand, orders inquiry, restrains private parties, and directs protection of 2,866 acres.

24 December, 2025 07:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email