38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Brings Finality To 98-Year-Old Temple Dispute Between Kuruba Families In Andhra Pradesh [Read Judgment]

By Samriddhi Ojha      13 November, 2025 02:22 PM      0 Comments
SC Brings Finality To 98 Year Old Temple Dispute Between Kuruba Families In Andhra Pradesh

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has finally resolved a nearly century-old temple dispute between two Kuruba families from Andhra Pradesh concerning the management and worship rights of Lord Sangalappa Swamy.

A Bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi delivered its judgment on November 11, 2025, upholding the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision that had set aside the executing court’s decree passed in favour of the Kapadam family.

The litigation, spanning over nine decades, involved members of the Kamatam family of Yerrayapalli village and the Kapadam family of Gungulakunta village, both claiming traditional and hereditary rights over the temple rituals and the custody of the idols.

The Court noted that the dispute originated in 1927, leading to a compromise decree in 1933, under which both families were to share the temple’s administration and rituals. As per the terms of the decree, the two families were to perform worship alternately every three months, exchange custody of the idols every six months, and share expenses equally, with the Kamatam family paying ₹2,000 towards their half share.

However, alleging breach of the terms, the Kapadam family filed an execution petition in 2000 seeking enforcement of the compromise decree. The executing court in 2005 allowed the plea and ordered the return of the idols to the Kapadam side under Order XXI Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This order was later reversed by the High Court in 2012, which found no substantive evidence of any violation of the compromise decree.

Dismissing the appeal before it, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s findings and observed that the executing court had erred in proceeding on presumptions rather than proven facts. The Bench held that the appellants failed to produce reliable evidence showing any breach or disobedience of the compromise decree by the respondents.

The Court observed:
“Findings based on assumptions cannot replace evidence. There is nothing on record to indicate that the terms of the compromise decree were violated or that the conditions therein were disobeyed.”

It further noted that there was no record of appointment of trustees or maintenance of accounts as mandated under the decree, nor was there proof of the ₹2,000 payment or rotation of idols between the two families.

Concluding that the High Court’s order suffered from no legal infirmity, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, thereby bringing closure to one of India’s longest-standing private temple disputes.

Case Title: Kapadam Sangalappa & Ors. v. Kamatam Sangalappa & Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: Hon’ble Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon’ble Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

Date of Judgment: November 11, 2025

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email