38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC calls Red Fort attack as direct attack on the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      04 November, 2022 12:16 AM      0 Comments
SC calls Red Fort attack as direct attack on the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a review petition filed by a member of banned terrorist outfits Lashkar-e-Taiba, Mohd Arif alias Ashfaq against the capital punishment awarded to him in 2000 Red Fort attack case, after noting that there was a direct attack on the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.

A bench of Chief Justice U U Lalit and Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Bela M Trivedi concluded there is nothing on record which can be taken to be a mitigating circumstance in favour of the review petitioner.

"The suggestion that there is a possibility of retribution and rehabilitation, is not made out from and supported by any material on record. On the other hand, the aggravating circumstances evident from the record and specially the fact that there was a direct attack on the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India, completely outweigh the factors which may even remotely be brought into consideration as mitigating circumstances on record," the bench said.

Referring to the Mohd Ajmal Amir Kasab case judgement (2008 Mumbai terror attack) (2012), the bench pointed out that when there is challenge to the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India by acts of terrorism, such acts are taken as the most aggravating circumstances.

"It is well accepted that the cumulative effect of the aggravating factors and the mitigating circumstances must be taken into account before the death sentence is awarded," the bench said.

With regard to the convict's plea about inadminissbility of call details records data, the bench said even after eschewing that there were other circumstances, including a disclosure statement, which led an encounter at Batla house and killing of Abu Shamal alias Faisal, which went against the convict.

Arif, a Pakistan national, was held guilty of murder, criminal conspiracy and waging war against the country.

On April 28, 2014, the court had stayed his execution.

Three persons, including two Army jawans, were killed in the attack.

In August 2011, the Supreme Court confirmed the death sentence of Arif for carrying out the December 2000 Red Fort attack. The apex court also dismissed his review petition later in August 2011.

However, in 2016, the apex court decided to re-hear his review petition, after 2014 judgement by the Constitution bench which directed for open court hearing in review petitions by the death row convicts.

In November 2005, the trial court had awarded Arif a death sentence. The trial court had also fined Arif Rs 4.35 lakh for the attack on December 22, 2000. The Delhi High Court, in 2007, upheld the death sentence to Arif.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email