38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Slams Central Government, States That Their Patience Is Being Tested Over Pending Appointment Of Personnel Under The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      06 September, 2021 05:18 PM      0 Comments
 Supreme Court Slams Central Government, States That Their Patience Is Being Tested Over Pending Appointment Of Personnel Under The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021

The Apex Court on Monday, September 6, 2021, questioned and criticized the Central Governments delay in appointing personnel to the tribunals under the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021.

The court also slammed the government regarding the inclusion of identical provisions in the act which the apex court had struck down in its earlier decision.

APPOINTMENT IN THE TRIBUNALS

The Bench consisting of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice DY Chandrachud, and Justice L Nageswara Rao stated that the Central Government has not been respecting the judgement of the court and has been testing their patience by not appointing the members and other important personnel to the various tribunals.

The Bench demanded the answers from the Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta representing the government about the number of appointments that have been made until now.

The Supreme Court further questioned the Central Government about the major tribunals such as the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) , National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Consumer forum, Green Tribunal, Armed Forces Tribunal, Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), Debt Recovery Tribunal that have become virtually inoperative as their members have not yet been appointed by the Central Government. 

IDENTICAL PROVISIONS

Justice Chandrachud held that Legislature can take away the basis of the judgment of the Supreme Court, but you cannot pass laws directly contradicting the Supreme Court JUDGMENT.

There were four provisions included in the new act which were struck down by Justice Rao of the Supreme Court in Madras Bar Association. They were as follows -

Any person who is below 50 years of age cannot be appointed as the chairperson or member, three names to the panel would be suggested by the selection committee, members of the tribunal would have a four-year term, and salary and terms of appointment were supposed to be the same as the bureaucrats.

WRIT PETITION

Along with the stated line of question, the Bench took action by issuing a notice on the writ petition filed by the Member of Parliament from Congress, Jairam Ramesh against the Tribunal Reforms Act stating that the act is in contempt of the orders of the court, as it consists of the provisions which it had struck down previously.

PRESENT SCENARIO 

The Bench has ordered that they will listen to the matter again in the coming week, but expect some appointments to be made by the Central Government until then.

They also stated that they do not wish to involve the Attorney General as they are not interested in any further confrontation in this regard.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email