38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC closes proceedings against 30 Army personnel in case of killings of tribals in Nagaland [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      18 September, 2024 03:38 PM      0 Comments
SC closes proceedings against 30 Army personnel in case of killings of tribals in Nagaland

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has closed criminal proceedings  against 30 Army personnel pursuant to FIRs lodged on December 7, 2021 for allegedly shooting down tribals in Nagaland's Mon District, mistaking them as militants and subsequent flare up, in view of absence of sanction under Section 6 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale, however, said in case sanction is granted at any stage, the proceedings against them may continue and may proceed in accordance with law and be brought to a logical conclusion.

The court's judgment came on writ petitions filed by Rabina Ghale and another and Anjali Gupta, wives of accused Army officers.

During the hearing, Nagaland's Advocate General K N Balagopal had sought a direction to the Army authorities to carry on proceedings against the personnel on administrative side as per an affidavit filed earlier before the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

The court, however, said, "The submission does not merit consideration as that would be at the sole discretion of the Armed Forces whether or not to carry on disciplinary proceedings against its officers."

The bench said the concerned wing of the Armed Forces would be at liberty to take or not to take any disciplinary proceedings against its officers.

The petitioners prayed for quashing of the FIRs and for disciplinary action against the entire team as per the provisions of the Army Act and Rules with regard to the incident of December 04, 2021.

They contended the action initiated was against the mandate of law and it was solely targeted at attacking soldiers in exercise of their bona fide duties of upholding the dignity of Indian Flag.

On July 19, 2022, the court had stayed the proceedings in the FIRs.

The bench had earlier noted the proceedings in this case emanated out of an incident of December 4, 2021 which led to a firing in which six persons were killed. The incident flared up leading to more killings and also killing of one of the Army personnel. It was alleged that a finger of the husband of Anjali Gupta, the writ petitioner was also chopped off.

The competent authority by an order of February 28, 2023 declined the sanction under Section 6 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958.

"In view of the specific bar contained in Section 6 of the AFSP Act, 1958 which provides that no prosecution, suit, or other legal proceedings can be instituted except with the previous sanction of the central government with respect to the exercise of any power conferred under the said Act, the proceedings based on the impugned FIRs cannot continue any further," the bench said.

The state government said it assailed the correctness of the order of February 28, 2023, passed by the competent authority, declining sanction under Section 6 of the AFSP Act, 1958, by filing a writ petition.

"We have no manner of doubt that, in case, if ultimately at some stage, sanction is granted under Section 6 of the AFSP Act, 1958, the proceedings pursuant to the impunged FIRs are liable to be continued," the bench said.

On December 4, 2021, it was alleged an Indian Army team fired at a pickup truck carrying miners in Oting village in Eastern Nagaland, mistaking them for militants, killing 6 civilians. The Indian Army had initially stated their action to be part of ambush operations on terror outfit in Nagaland.

Eight more civilians were subsequently killed after security forces allegedly opened fire after the incident triggered violence in the area. Army authorities claimed they were conducting an operation in the area after receiving inputs on the movement of militants of Yung Aung faction of proscribed outfit NSCN (K).

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-consider-plea-against-invite-to-banu-mushtaq-to-inaugurate-mysuru-dasara-festival
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider plea against invite to Banu Mushtaq to inaugurate Mysuru Dasara festival

SC to hear plea challenging invite to Booker winner Banu Mushtaq as chief guest for Mysuru Dasara, citing religious rights and traditions.

18 September, 2025 01:20 PM
karta-of-huf-can-sell-joint-family-property-as-per-legal-necessity-sc
Trending Judiciary
'Karta' of HUF can sell joint family property as per legal necessity: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: ‘Karta’ of Hindu Undivided Family can sell joint family property for legal necessity, ruling depends on facts of each case.

18 September, 2025 01:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-asks-why-anti-pollution-measures-firecrackers-ban-for-delhi-alone
Trending Judiciary
SC asks why anti pollution measures, firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

SC questions why firecracker bans, anti-pollution steps apply only to Delhi; stresses need for uniform clean air policy across India.

13 September, 2025 10:43 AM
delhi-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-abhishek-bachchans-personality-rights
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Restrains Unauthorised Use Of Abhishek Bachchan’s Personality Rights [Read Order]

Delhi HC restrains misuse of Abhishek Bachchan’s personality rights, orders removal of unauthorized content, citing dignity & economic harm.

13 September, 2025 12:42 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-cbfc-ban-on-film-masoom-kaatil-for-promoting-vigilantism-communal-disharmony
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC Upholds CBFC Ban on Film ‘Masoom Kaatil’ for Promoting Vigilantism, Communal Disharmony [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds CBFC’s refusal to certify ‘Masoom Kaatil’, citing vigilantism, communal disharmony, gore and risk to social harmony.

13 September, 2025 01:02 PM
grandchild-cannot-claim-share-in-grandparents-property-if-parents-are-alive-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Grandchild Cannot Claim Share In Grandparents Property If Parents Are Alive: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Grandchildren have no automatic right to grandparents’ property if parents are alive: Delhi HC clears misconception

15 September, 2025 10:34 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email