38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024

Plea in Supreme Court Against Automatic Granting of Custody of Male Child to Father in Dawoodi Bora Community

By Gautami Chakravarty      17 December, 2020 05:26 PM      0 Comments
Plea in Supreme Court Against Automatic Granting of Custody of Male Child to Father in Dawoodi Bora Community

A writ petition has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of a custom followed by the Dawoodi Bora community among Muslims, according to which the custody of a male child above the age of 7 automatically goes to the father.

The petition has been filed by a Mumbai-resident, Fatema Quaid Zohar Challawala, stating that the said custom is violative of Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution inasmuch as it arbitrarily deprives a mother from the custody of her male child, without any due process of law.

She has alleged that the impugned custom also violates the right of the children of the Dawoodi Bora community as it ignores the principal of paramount welfare of a child. At the same time, she has alleged, the custom goes contrary to the right of a mother to dispute the custody of her child.

She has urged that any custom is subject to Part III of the Constitution, i.e. Fundamental Rights, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, 2017 SCC 1, and hence, it is also subject to Article 14 and its species right of Article 15.

If any custom or religious practice that is sought to be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution is in violation of Article 14 and 15, the same ought to be struck down as unconstitutional,the plea stated.

She has submitted that the impugned custom is not an essential religious practice of Islam and has urged the Court to take a progressive view in relation to the personal laws of Muslims vis--vis Rights of their women.

She has submitted that the impugned custom of giving custody of a child above the age of 7 to the father, without any process of law, encroaches upon the civil rights of women and should be declared as unconstitutional.

In the facts of the case, the Petitioner has alleged that her husband is under an illicit relationship with another lady and he is not at all interested in the welfare of the child. But in spite of that, the child has been forcefully taken away from the legal custody of the Petitioner, notwithstanding that it was the Petitioner who took care of their son all these years.

The petition is filed thorugh Advocates Sriram P. and Debopriyo Pal.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM


Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email