38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, August 05, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

BJPs Rath Yatra: SC Declines Permission, Asks BJP To Submit Modified Proposal To Govt [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      16 January, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
BJPs Rath Yatra: SC Declines Permission, Asks BJP To Submit Modified Proposal To Govt [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on January 15, 2019, declined to grant permission to Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to hold its proposed Rath Yatra in West Bengal.

However, the top court has asked the Party to submit a modified proposal to satisfy the state governments apprehensions on law and order issues.

The order was passed by a Bench of Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi and JusticesL Nageswara Rao and Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

While the court has put restrictions on holding the Rath Yatra in the State, it has directed the state government to permit all public meetings and rallies.

Senior AdvocateMukul Rohatgi, appearing for BJP, submitted before the court that the case involves a Constitutional question and the State was infringing upon the petitioners fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a).

Senior AdvocateAbhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the State of West Bengal, submitted that the state has no objection in giving permission for public meetings organised by the petitioner. However, the issue was with respect to moving yatra which is likely to pass through communally sensitive areas.

Taking into consideration the submissions made by both the parties, the court said that So far as the Rath Yatras are concerned, there appears to be some objections of the State Government. Shorn of details, the Rath Yatras contemplate simultaneous processions from four different parts of the State, covering all the 42 Parliamentary Constituencies in a total period of 20 days. A minimum number of 2000 people is expected to join each of the Rath Yatras proposed. The Rath Yatras naturally would cover the entire length and breadth of the State and would pass through different areas inhabited by different communities. The extent to which the Rath Yatras have been planned, the details of which have been submitted to the Government, has led to certain apprehensions in the mind of the Government as to the possible effect of the Rath Yatras on the law and order situation in the State.

Looking into the details of the proposed Rath Yatras and the order of the State Government issued on January 14, 2019, the court said that we cannot say that the apprehensions expressed by the State Government are totally unfounded. It is for the State Government to maintain law and order in the State and the apprehensions expressed in the order will have to be addressed to by the petitioner to the Government in a reasonable manner.

Hence, the court asked the BJP to submit a modified proposal to satisfy the state governments apprehensions on law and order issues. Upon submission of the proposal, the government will consider the matter and pass appropriate order keeping in mind that the case involves exercise of fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(a).

Insofar as the Rath Yatras are concerned, it will be open for the petitioner to submit a further modified proposal, which meets and answers the apprehensions of the State Government, so far as maintenance of law and order is concerned. Once such a proposal is submitted, the State Government will consider the matter and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind that the present involves a case of exercise of the fundamental rights, inter alia, under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. It is in that spirit that we expect the State Government to deal with the matter on receipt of such revised proposal as may be submitted, the court said.

Further, on the point of holding public meetings and rallies in the State, the court directed the State Government to permit all public meetings and rallies that are proposed to be held by the petitioner at different venues. Provided adequate and timely information and schedules of such meetings, rallies etc. are furnished by the petitioner.

By this order, the court has effectively upheld the order of a Division Bench of Calcutta High Court which had upheld the State governments decision to deny permission for the Rath Yatra.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM

TOP STORIES

a-new-dawn-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-replacing-colonial-shackles-with-indigenous-legal-reforms
Trending Vantage Points
A New Dawn in India’s Criminal Justice System: Replacing Colonial Shackles with Indigenous Legal Reforms

This research paper examines India’s transition from IPC, CrPC, and IEA to BNS, BNSS, and BSA, emphasizing victim-centric and technology-driven justice reforms.

30 July, 2025 12:41 PM
your-conduct-does-not-inspire-confidence-sc-reserves-judgment-on-justice-yashwant-varmas-plea
Trending Judiciary
‘Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence’: SC Reserves Judgment on Justice Yashwant Varma’s Plea

CJI can recommend removal of a judge in cases of grave misconduct, SC says; clarifies CJI isn’t a mere post office & Parliament has final say.

30 July, 2025 04:14 PM
cricket-stadium-would-be-required-sc-slams-tn-govt-again-for-roping-2000-accused-500-witnesses
Trending Judiciary
'Cricket stadium would be required,' SC slams TN govt again for roping 2000 accused, 500 witnesses in trial against Senthil Balaji

SC slams TN govt for implicating 2,000 accused & 500 witnesses in Senthil Balaji cash-for-jobs case, says trial needs a cricket stadium to fit all.

30 July, 2025 05:20 PM
accident-on-way-to-office-and-return-to-be-covered-for-compensation-under-ec-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accident on way to office and return to be covered for compensation under EC Act: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Accidents while commuting to and from work covered under Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923; ruling gives retrospective effect to benefit employees.

30 July, 2025 05:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email