38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC declines to entertain plea for direction to EC to act against PM, BJP leaders

By Jhanak Sharma      15 May, 2024 12:55 PM      0 Comments
SC declines to entertain plea for direction to EC to act against PM BJP leaders

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a petition seeking direction to the Election Commission to take action against the alleged hate speeches made by BJP leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during the ongoing general elections.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma said that the court is not keen to issue any direction as sought in the petition in relation with the EC.

The petition was filed by one EAS Sarma and others.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the petitioners, vehemently contended that the poll body is not doing its job properly.

We are not inclined to interfere. We cannot issue such directions under Article 32 of the Constitution," the bench said.

The counsel submitted that the court may then at least clarify that only "at this stage" it was not entertaining the plea.

While declining to entertain the plea, the bench said that worse things will again happen when the next election comes up.

The plea raised concerns with the speeches delivered by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Minister Anurag Singh Thakur, along with the content posted by the BJP on its social media handles.

The bench also refused to entertain another plea seeking a direction to the EC to disqualify Prime Minister Narendra Modi from elections for six years under Representation of People Act.

In a separate plea, one Fatima sought a direction to the ECI to take action against the PM as per the model code of conduct, mentioned in the Compendium of Instruction Volume-III under Rules-General Conduct (1 and 3) immediately.

During the brief hearing, the bench asked the petitioner to approach the relevant authorities with the grievance.

"Have you approached the authorities? For writ of mandamus you must approach the authorities first," said the bench. The petitioner urged the bench to allow the plea to be withdrawn.

The plea contended that on April 21, 2024, the PM, as a part of poll campaign for Lok Sabha Election 2024, addressed a public rally of voters at Banswara, Rajasthan.

"He made statements which are clearly aimed at creating enmity between groups. The speech has been uploaded by the official handle of Narendra Modi in the public domain," the plea said.

The plea said that various organisations and many individuals have filed the complaints with the ECI but the poll body has failed to take any effective action against the PM, so as to restrain him from seeking the votes in the name of religious deities and places of worship.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email