38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC directs Puducherry admin to set up SIT led by woman IPS officer to probe rape, cheating FIR against police officer [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      14 February, 2024 06:49 PM      0 Comments
SC directs Puducherry admin to set up SIT led by woman IPS officer to probe rape cheating FIR against police officer

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ordered for setting up a Special Investigation Team to probe charges of rape made by an Associate Professor at an engineering college against a police officer.

The apex court emphasised that bounden duty of every court of law that injustice wherever visible must be hammered and the voice of a victim of the crime is dispassionately heard.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and K V Viswanathan directed the Puducherry administration to constitute the SIT to be headed by a directly recruited woman IPS Officer to probe the charges within three months.

The woman lodged the FIR in 2014. She alleged the officer pretended to marry the petitioner, even though he was already married with another woman and forced her to undergo abortion twice between 2012 and 2014.

The police, however, filed the charge sheet filed for diluted charges under Sections 354A and 506 of the IPC. Instead of protest petition, she filed an application before judicial magistrate under Section 173(8) of the CrPC for further investigation.

"We fail to understand what prevented the magistrate from treating that application purportedly filed under Section 173(8) of CrPC as a protest petition and then decide the same on merits," the bench said.

The court said it was a fit case where the Judicial Magistrate ought to have invoked his power under Section 173(8) of CrPC and directed the investigating officer to further investigate such serious allegations since the denial of further investigation has led to gross injustice to the appellant.

"A technicality like the caption of the application/petition could not be an impediment to consider the substance thereof and then determine whether or not the matter required further investigation so as to find out the prima facie element of offences under Sections 376, 417 and 420 of the IPC. Such a permissible procedural recourse has been unfortunately overlooked by the High Court as well," the bench said.

The court allowed the appeal filed by the woman against the Madras High Court's order, saying it was not sure whether police tried ascertain veracity of charges by collecting evidence from neighbourhood or from the hospital.
 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email