NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has expressed a strong disapproval of the practice in the Kerala High Court allowing accused to directly file an application for anticipatory bail before it, instead of asking them to approach the sessions court.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said, if the practice of entertaining the applications for pre-arrest bail directly in the High Court is encouraged, and the parties concerned are not relegated to first approach the Sessions Court concerned, the High Court would be flooded with a spate of pre-arrest bail applications thereby creating a chaotic situation.
The court was considering a plea filed by Mohammed Rasal C and another. The bench made as absolute an interim protection granted to the petitioners on May 5, 2025.
After noting that the petitioners directly approached the High Court in the matter without filing a plea in the Sessions Court, the bench issued notice to the High Court through its Registrar General.
The court also appointed senior advocate Sidharth Luthra as amicus curiae, assisted by G Arudhra Rao, Advocate, to enable the court examine the matter.
In its order, the court emphasised if the parties are required to approach the sessions court concerned for seeking remedy of pre-arrest bail, there is a strong probability that significant number of applications would be allowed at that level only thereby acting as a filtration process before the process reaches the High Court.
"Though the concurrent jurisdiction is conferred upon the Sessions Court and the High Court to entertain a prayer for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the BNSS (formerly Section 438 CrPC), the hierarchy of courts demands that no person seeking such remedy should be encouraged or allowed to directly approach the High Court by bypassing the jurisdiction of the concerned Sessions Court," the bench said.
The court noted, in most of the States, there is a consistent practice requiring the litigant concerned to first approach the Sessions Court for seeking relief of pre-arrest bail and only in the event of denial of such relief, the litigant would be granted access to approach the High Court for seeking such relief.
"This is, of course, subject to just exceptions and the High Court, for reasons to be recorded, may entertain an application for pre-arrest bail directly in special/extra-ordinary circumstances," the bench said.
The court fixed the matter for consideration on October 14, 2025.
Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.
