38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Dismisses Petition Seeking Determination Of Minority Status Of Religion, Based On Population Of Concerned State

By LawStreet News Network      21 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
SC Dismisses Petition Seeking Determination Of Minority

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed before the Supreme Court of India was dismissed on Thursday (February 20, 2020) which prayed that the minority status of religion be ascertained based on their population in the concerned State. Petitioner pointed out that Hindus are not considered minorities even in the states where they are not in majority. The bench consisted of Justices RF Nariman and S Ravindra Bhat, who asked the petitioner, Senior Advocate and BJP Spokesperson Ashwini Upadhayay to approach each High Court of the respective States to redefine the Status of the minorities of the State. The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1949which deals with Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred in this Part of III;

(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed

(2) The Supreme Court shall have the power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs like habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part

(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2)

(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

The PIL sought direction or guidelines from the Bench of the Apex Court to identify the minorities in the spirit mentioned in the Article 29-30. The argument which was made by the petitioner was following the judgment made by the eleven judge bench in TMA Pai v. Union of India (2002) wanted to ensure that only those religious and linguistic groups which are economically, socially and politically non-dominant and inferior in number, enjoy the rights and get the protection under the Article 29-30. The status of Hindus in the areas like Lakshadweep, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Jammu and Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Manipur is 2.5 per cent, 2.75 per cent, 8.75 per cent, 11.53 per cent, 28.44 per cent, 29 per cent, 31.39 per cent and 38.40, respectively. 

Senior Advocate Vikas Singh gave an argument in the Supreme Court that the Centre should be allowed to redefine the term minorities in a state-wise manner. The Petitioner while addressing the media said that he will soon be submitting a petition in the Delhi High Court. 

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email