38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC extends stay on sentence of police officer in contempt for public flogging of Muslim men

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      23 January, 2024 05:18 PM      0 Comments
SC extends stay on sentence of police officer in contempt for public flogging of Muslim men

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended stay on 14 days of jail awarded to four policemen in contempt proceedings for publicly flogging Muslim men by tying them to a pole.

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta agreed to examine their case against the High Court.

The court, however, asked them as to what kind of authorities they exercised to commit the atrocities.

For the police officers, senior advocate Siddharth Dave submitted that his clients were already facing criminal prosecution, departmental proceedings, as well as an inquiry by the National Human Rights Commission.

He questioned the high court's jurisdiction to proceed against them in a contempt case, by claiming that a 'wilful disobedience' of the court's order in the D K Basu case could not be made out.

The bench asked Dave, So you have authority under law? To tie people to polls and beat them?...and take videos?"

The counsel contended that the question was not about culpability of the accused, but the jurisdiction of the high court.

"So, is ignorance of law a valid defence, the bench asked the counsel.

The counsel also asked the high court's findings that the Muslim men were kept in illegal detention for over 24 hours.

He said that this finding is subject to a trial and under contempt jurisdiction, they cannot be prosecuted for an offence.

After hearing submissions, the bench agreed to examine the appeal.

The counsel sought an extension of the high court's order which stayed on its own order in the contempt case.

The bench said, "Enjoy the custody. You will be a guest of your own officers. They will provide you special treatment."

However, upon making of requests by the counsel, the court stayed the contempt proceedings before the high court.

Officers A V Parmar and three others, challenged the HC's order passed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The high court had agreed to stay its orders execution for three months to allow the police officers to challenge its verdict.

The high court had charged them with contempt of court, after five of the Muslim men flogged in public view in Gujarat's Kheda moved the court alleging a violation of the DK Basu guidelines on custodial torture.
 



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email