38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Flags Rs 600 Cr Unclaimed Compensation; Directs MACTs, Labour Courts to Trace Claimants and Ensure Direct Bank Transfers [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      23 April, 2025 02:59 PM      0 Comments
SC Flags Rs 600 Cr Unclaimed Compensation Directs MACTs Labour Courts to Trace Claimants and Ensure Direct Bank Transfers

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it was very disturbing to find that so many successful claimants have been deprived of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as since a huge sum of money was found as lying unclaimed.

The apex court directed the motor accident claims tribunals and labour courts to directly credit the compensation amount to claimants' bank accounts

"The issue arising in this suo motu petition is of great concern. The amounts represent the compensation granted to claimants in the claims filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Though the claimants are held entitled to these amounts, they have not withdrawn the same," a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said.

In slew of directions to ensure that the compensation is paid to claimants, the bench said that when motor accident claims tribunals pass an order of deposit of compensation amounts with them, direction should be given to invest those amounts in fixed deposit with any nationalised bank and the same to be renewed till further instructions.

The court said it was not clear how many States have framed rules under Section 176 of the Motor Vehicles Act regarding the filing of applications before the tribunals. Till such rules are framed, the court directed the high courts to frame practice directions.

It found that a whopping sum of over Rs 282 crores was lying unclaimed in the MACTs and about Rs 6.61 crores in the labour courts in Gujarat. The figure was approximately Rs 239 crores in the MACTs and Rs 92 crores in the Labour Courts in Uttar Pradesh. Likewise, the amounts unclaimed in the MACTS in West Bengal were Rs 2.5 crores, Rs 4.59 crores in Maharashtra and Rs 3.61 Crores in Goa.

Acting on an email received from B B Pathak, a retired District Judge from Gujarat, the Court had initiated a suo motu case in 2024.

The case was registered as In Re: compensation amounts deposited with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals and Labour Courts.

In its directions, the court said that while passing an interim or final order of grant of compensation, the MACTs shall call upon the person or persons held entitled to receive compensation to produce their bank account details. The high courts have been asked to create a dashboard on which the information regarding compensation amounts should be regularly updated.

"All the High Courts shall issue administrative directions to the MAC Tribunals and Commissioners under the 1923 Act to initiate a massive drive to ascertain the whereabouts of the persons who have been held to be entitled to receive compensation, but have not taken the same. This shall be done by taking the assistance of the District and Taluka Legal Services Authorities and para-legal volunteers," the bench said.

The court directed the High Courts to take up implementation of the directions at the earliest and submit compliance reports to this Court on or before July 30, 2025, so that further directions, if necessary, can be issued. The Registrar Generals, in their report, would set out the details of the amounts still lying without disbursement, the bench said.

"We make it clear that all the High Courts are free to take measures in addition to what is directed under this order to ensure that the pending amounts reach the claimants," the bench said, scheduling the matter for reporting compliance on August 18, 2025.
 

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email