38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC grants bail to Senthil Balaji: upholds right to speedy trial, rejects stringent bail conditions [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      27 September, 2024 06:10 PM      0 Comments
SC grants bail to Senthil Balaji upholds right to speedy trial rejects stringent bail conditions

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday granted bail to former Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji in connection with a money laundering case, holding constitutional courts cannot allow the Enforcement Directorate to use stringent bail conditions as a tool to incarcerate an accused without trial in violation of his fundamental right to speedy trial.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih ordered release of MLA and DMK leader Balaji, arrested on June 14, 2923 in cases, arising out of cash for jobs scam, on bail after noting his 15 months of custody with no possibility of completion of trial in a few years.

The court said the requirement of expeditious disposal of cases must be read into the special statutes, including the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, as inordinate delay in the conclusion of the trial and the higher threshold for the grant of bail cannot go together.

The top court said the constitutional courts cannot allow provisions like Section 45(1)(ii) (containing stringent conditions of bail) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to become instruments in the hands of the Enforcement Directorate to continue incarceration for a long time when there is no possibility of a trial of the scheduled offence and the PMLA offence concluding within a reasonable time.

In its judgment, the bench also observed some day, the courts, especially the Constitutional Courts, will have to take a call on a peculiar situation that arises in our justice delivery system.

"There are cases where clean acquittal is granted by the criminal courts to the accused after very long incarceration as an undertrial. When we say clean acquittal, we are excluding the cases where the witnesses have turned hostile or there is a bona fide defective investigation. In such cases of clean acquittal, crucial years in the life of the accused are lost. In a given case, it may amount to violation of rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution which may give rise to a claim for compensation," the bench said.

Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Sidharth Luthra, appearing for Balaji submitted the trial of the scheduled offences and, consequently, the PMLA offence is not likely to be completed in three to four years or even more.

"If the appellant's detention is continued, it will amount to an infringement of his fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India of speedy trial," the bench said.

The bench noted Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate contended the appellant enjoyed influential position in the State, which may have resulted in a so called compromise between the bribe givers and the bribe takers.

Considering the apprehension of the appellant tampering with the evidence, stringent conditions must be imposed, the bench said.

In view of stringent conditions of bail in special statutes including PMLA, the bench said the expeditious disposal of the trial is also warranted considering the higher threshold set for the grant of bail.

"Hence, the requirement of expeditious disposal of cases must be read into these statutes. Inordinate delay in the conclusion of the trial and the higher threshold for the grant of bail cannot go together," the bench said.

The court underscored that it is a well settled principle of our criminal jurisprudence that “bail is the rule, and jail is the exception.”

The court relied upon K A Najeeb case which held the stringent provisions for the grant of bail do not take away the power of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on the grounds of violation of Part III of the Constitution.

"If the Constitutional Courts do not exercise their jurisdiction in such cases, the rights of the undertrials under Article 21 of the Constitution of India will be defeated," the bench said.

The court felt when the trial of the complaint under PMLA is likely to prolong beyond reasonable limits, the Constitutional Courts will have to consider exercising their powers to gr nt bail.    

"The reason is that Section 45(1)(ii) does not confer power on the State to detain an accused for an unreasonably long time, especially when there is no possibility of trial concluding within a reasonable time," it said.

The Madras High Court had on February 28, 2024 declined to provide relief to Balaji.

It was stated between 2011 and 2016, the appellant was holding the post of Transport Minister in the Government of Tamil Nadu. While discharging his duties as a Minister, in connivance with his personal assistant and his brother, he allegedly collected large amounts by promising job opportunities to several person in various positions in the Transport Department.

In its order, the court directed him to furnish a bond of Rs 25 lakh with two sureties of the like amount. It directed Balaji not to contact victims directly or indirectly or it may be a ground to cancel the bail.

Among other conditions, the court directed him to mark his attendance every Monday and Friday between 11 am and 12 noon in the office of the Deputy Director, the Directorate of Enforcement at Chennai.  He should also appear on the first Saturday of every calendar month before the investigating officers of the three scheduled offences and should regularly and punctually appear before the trial court, dealing with the cases. He was also told to surrender passport.
  [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-hear-plea-on-august-8-seeking-time-bound-restoration-of-statehood-to-jammu-and-kashmir
Trending Judiciary
SC to Hear Plea on August 8 Seeking Time-Bound Restoration of Statehood to Jammu & Kashmir

SC to hear plea on Aug 8 seeking time-bound restoration of statehood to J&K, citing violation of federalism and delay despite govt assurance.

05 August, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-cancels-bail-of-ex-dhfl-promoter-dheeraj-wadhawan-in-42000-crore-bank-fraud-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Bail of Ex-DHFL Promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 Crore Bank Fraud Case

SC cancels bail of ex-DHFL promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 cr bank loan scam case; directs him to surrender within 2 weeks despite medical plea.

05 August, 2025 05:34 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-directs-telangana-speaker-to-decide-disqualification-petitions
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months [Read Order]

SC orders Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification pleas against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months, stressing swift action on political defections.

31 July, 2025 04:58 PM
sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM
electronic-communication-not-valid-mode-of-service-of-notice-under-section-35-bnss-sc
Trending Judiciary
Electronic communication not valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 BNSS: SC [Read Order]

SC holds WhatsApp or email not valid for notice under Section 35 BNSS due to arrest risk; personal service required to safeguard liberty.

01 August, 2025 11:25 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email