38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Grants Mutual Consent Divorce Under Article 142, Praises Wife for Returning Gold and Waiving Alimony [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      13 December, 2025 08:39 PM      0 Comments
SC Grants Mutual Consent Divorce Under Article 142 Praises Wife for Returning Gold and Waiving Alimony

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India, on December 11, 2025, dissolved the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent in the present case, exercising its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. The dissolution followed an amicable settlement reached by the parties before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre.

The matrimonial dispute came before the apex court through a Transfer Petition filed by the husband, seeking the transfer of the divorce petition filed by the wife from the Family Courts in Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, to the Family Courts in Pune, Maharashtra. The Transfer Petition was referred to mediation on October 8, 2025.

A Settlement Agreement executed on November 29, 2025, was presented before the Court. The agreement outlined the terms of a mutual consent divorce, recording that the marriage, solemnised on June 30, 2021, had broken down owing to “irreconcilable differences” and that the parties had not been cohabiting since December 14, 2023.

A significant aspect of the settlement was the wife’s waiver of alimony and maintenance. As recorded in the Settlement Agreement:

“The First Party has volunteered to give up her right to ‘alimony’ in any form and ‘spousal maintenance’ from the Second Party under this Agreement. She is not, and will not, claim alimony or spousal maintenance from the Second Party either now or in the future.”

The Court, while noting the terms of the settlement, specifically acknowledged a rare gesture made by the wife. The Bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, observed in its order:

“This is one of the rare settlements we have come across over a period of time wherein nothing has been demanded by the wife from her husband. On the contrary, the wife has handed over the gold bangles which were gifted to her at the time of her marriage. We are told that these bangles belong to the mother of the husband. We appreciate this kind gesture, which is very rare to be seen nowadays.”

Pursuant to the settlement, the parties agreed that the wife would relinquish her rights and interests in their joint savings account and joint safe deposit locker with HDFC Bank, Wanowrie Branch, Pune, and would execute the necessary documents for deletion of her name from these accounts within 21 days from the execution of the agreement.

The final order stated:

“In such circumstances, referred to above, we dissolve the marriage between the parties in exercise of our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. All proceedings between the parties, civil and criminal, stand terminated.”

The Registry was directed to draw a decree accordingly in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Case Details:

Case Name: Vikram v. Priya

Case No.: Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2058 of 2025

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Date of Order: December 11, 2025

Advocates for Petitioner (Vikram): Mr. Sagar Pahune Patil, AOR, and Mr. Mihir Raje, Advocate

Advocates for Respondent (Priya): Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, AOR, and Ms. Vanshita Gupta, Advocate

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email