38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Grants Statutory Status to Delhi Ridge Management Board to Safeguard Delhi’s “Green Lungs” [Read Judgment]

By Samriddhi Ojha      12 November, 2025 11:15 AM      0 Comments
SC Grants Statutory Status to Delhi Ridge Management Board to Safeguard Delhis Green Lungs

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has directed that the Delhi Ridge Management Board (DRMB) be accorded statutory recognition to ensure effective and uniform protection of the Delhi Ridge, terming it the “green lungs” of the city amid its worsening air pollution crisis.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K.V. Chandran delivered the judgment on November 11, 2025, while hearing matters concerning the preservation of the Ridge area in In Re: Delhi’s Ridge.

The Court observed that despite continuous judicial supervision over the years, the absence of statutory backing for the DRMB has resulted in overlapping jurisdictions, lack of coordination, and continued degradation of the Ridge. It noted that although the total Ridge area extends to approximately 7,784 hectares, only 103.48 hectares have been notified as Reserved Forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, leaving the majority of the area unprotected.

Rejecting the objection of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) that statutory recognition may cause overlap with existing authorities, the Court held that a unified legal framework under a single statutory body would enhance efficiency, accountability, and ecological preservation.

The Bench underscored that the Ridge performs an indispensable environmental function—acting as a natural barrier against air pollution and soil erosion—and therefore, its preservation is a constitutional and ecological necessity.

The Court observed:

“The Ridge is not merely a stretch of forest land but an ecological lifeline of Delhi. In the current state of environmental distress, preservation of the Ridge assumes the character of an urgent constitutional obligation.”


KEY DIRECTIONS

1. Statutory Empowerment of DRMB:

The Delhi Ridge Management Board shall be granted statutory status through appropriate legislative or executive action to ensure enforceability of its decisions and accountability in its functioning.

2. Reconstitution of the Board:

The DRMB shall be reconstituted with defined authority and jurisdiction for the protection, restoration, and sustainable management of the Ridge, including measures against encroachments and illegal constructions.

3. Transparency and Public Access:

The Board shall maintain records of proceedings, publish relevant reports, and ensure public accessibility of information regarding its actions and decisions.

4. Periodic Reporting to the Court:

The DRMB shall file bi-annual compliance reports before the Supreme Court detailing steps taken for conservation, rehabilitation, and removal of encroachments from the Ridge area.

5. Inter-Departmental Coordination:

All authorities and departments within the National Capital Territory of Delhi shall cooperate with and act in conformity with the directions issued by the DRMB.

The Supreme Court held that judicial monitoring alone cannot ensure long-term protection of ecologically sensitive areas without statutory backing. It emphasized that legislative recognition of the DRMB is essential to institutionalize accountability and ensure continuity of conservation efforts beyond ad hoc administrative mechanisms.

The Court reaffirmed that protection of the Ridge is integrally connected to the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, and that environmental preservation must be treated as a constitutional imperative rather than a discretionary policy matter.

The Bench concluded that statutory empowerment of the DRMB would serve to establish an enduring governance mechanism ensuring transparency, effective coordination, and sustained ecological balance in the National Capital Region.

Case Title: In Re: Delhi’s Ridge

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon’ble Justice K.V. Chandran

Date of Judgment: November 11, 2025

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email